Message from @aguyyouknow
Discord ID: 572075095724523520
Why honor people who lost?
:)
Well they did give us lacrosse and dream catchers
@I Know a Fat Guy The dog should have driven.
I spent a lot of years thinking that buffalo were extinct.
They are, i killed them all in Red Dead 2.
b/c California can't fail fast enough...https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/26/us/california-restaurants-climate-change-surcharge-trnd/index.html
@I Know a Fat Guy#359 to be fair it’s optional. That doesn’t mean the money will actually be used sensibly though
it's a socialist non-profit. that means:
1. it's activist welfare
2. it's guaranteed to be a waste
btw, so-called "Fair Trade" is also activist welfare and keeps poor people in third world countries out of employment
This dude stupid he says "a little higher tax isn't socialism guys". People in the democratic party are advocating nationalizing entire industries. And claims Venezuela isn't real socialism (all the weren't real socialism). No they were, that's the point you can't get there without Authoritarianism and killing a bunch of people. and even then you won't get there.
"they resent her charisma"
uh... yeah
sure
charisma
something like that
I guess being decent looking and dumber than a box of rocks is charisma... somehow
She's full on advocating nationalizing healthcare, transportation and every building in America. She's socialist and says so
(this is literally what he says)
"And I am painfully aware that the male Fox commentariat nurtures its sickly obsession with Ms. Ocasio-Cortez partly because they resent her cleverness, charisma and moral vitality"
which is.... beyond moronic
she's not clever, she's not charismatic
I view publishing a guy like this similar to publishing a neo-nazi
and she's literally under investigation for several issues related to how her team handled their campaign money
and how they got it
I'd agree with that. And to be clear, I'm fine with that
I actually would WANT NYT to publish both, as long as they make it clear that it's an opinion piece
because then we can look at his stupid fucking arguments and know that he's a moron
and same for publishing the ramblings of a literal neo-nazi
Publish both or publish neither. Also, no comments section tells you they' don't want a discussion.
oh, yeah, definitely. Regardless of the theoretical I'd LIKE to see, we already all know why the NYT published this
What does moral vitality mean? Lol
I was wondering the same thing
Sounds like one of those supplements you buy in a giant black bottle
Maybe it's that stuff Alex Jones sells 🤔
water filters?
But how else will I have all the gains?