Message from @uncephalized

Discord ID: 612902212842029058


2019-08-19 06:51:35 UTC  

except for the part where Mao was the one willing to justify any means to achieve his ends, liar

2019-08-19 06:51:51 UTC  

mao was trying to instill a MEANS

2019-08-19 06:52:14 UTC  

no, he was trying to create his utopia via whatever means seemed expedient

2019-08-19 06:52:16 UTC  

he wanted his own ideology implemented no matter what the cost

2019-08-19 06:52:25 UTC  

you are literally making my point for me

2019-08-19 06:52:45 UTC  

ideology != good results for humanity

2019-08-19 06:52:49 UTC  

you're stuck to your ideology

2019-08-19 06:52:51 UTC  

as was mao

2019-08-19 06:52:56 UTC  

as are you

2019-08-19 06:53:05 UTC  

you don't think you have one?

2019-08-19 06:53:22 UTC  

my thought processes are influenced by consequences, you have admitted that yours arent

2019-08-19 06:53:30 UTC  

sure they are

2019-08-19 06:53:34 UTC  

OH SHIT

2019-08-19 06:53:37 UTC  

<:SWEATSTINY:399640604792848400>

2019-08-19 06:53:52 UTC  

no, I have admitted that I am willing to accept some negative consequences in favor of more important positive ones

2019-08-19 06:53:58 UTC  

also known as "compromise"

2019-08-19 06:54:17 UTC  

you didnt say you thought you would get positive consequences at all, you just added that on right now you snake

2019-08-19 06:54:23 UTC  

hahaha

2019-08-19 06:54:24 UTC  

I remember saying earlier most conservatives have never touched philosophy all be it anecdotal it just keeps happening

2019-08-19 06:54:32 UTC  

I told you what my positive consequence was

2019-08-19 06:54:34 UTC  

liberty

2019-08-19 06:54:45 UTC  

no you didnt

2019-08-19 06:54:51 UTC  

freedom from authoritarian control over my actions and everyone else's

2019-08-19 06:55:02 UTC  

OK, if I failed to do so earlier, I'm doing so now.

2019-08-19 06:55:04 UTC  

uncephalizedToday at 4:48 PM
Ignoring is not the same as accepting as an unfortunate consequence of a more fundamental principle that in fact protects the rights of everyone, including the 'oppressed class'

2019-08-19 06:55:23 UTC  

I thought that was clear enough, but I can clarify if you wish.

2019-08-19 06:55:31 UTC  

you justified ignoring the bad consequences in order to institute a principle

2019-08-19 06:55:33 UTC  

its very clear

2019-08-19 06:56:01 UTC  

@Green Syndicalism Have you considered the consequences of the rights you are trying to institute?

2019-08-19 06:56:16 UTC  

we have already seen those consequences dude

2019-08-19 06:56:22 UTC  

I expressed a preference for holding everyone to the same universal standard rather than instituting inequality under the law based on protected class, sure.

2019-08-19 06:56:24 UTC  

we have protected classes

2019-08-19 06:57:08 UTC  

We also have a far more overreaching, bloated police state than we had before they were created. Coincidence?

2019-08-19 06:57:10 UTC  

the consequences are:
blacks are closing IQ/education gaps
they've closed some of the wealth gap

2019-08-19 06:57:24 UTC  

*"I remember saying earlier most conservatives have never touched philosophy all be it anecdotal it just keeps happening"*

2019-08-19 06:57:34 UTC  

@uncephalized i would say coincidence actually, yes

2019-08-19 06:57:43 UTC  

what would a leftist argument be without rampant arrogance

2019-08-19 06:57:43 UTC  

Then I would say you are blind.

2019-08-19 06:57:47 UTC  

because the police state came about through other legislation. nothing to do with protected classes

2019-08-19 06:57:55 UTC  

it came about because of the drug war and 9/11

2019-08-19 06:58:15 UTC  

Oh you sweet summer child.