Message from @uncephalized
Discord ID: 612901802123329567
Ignoring is not the same as accepting as an unfortunate consequence of a more fundamental principle that in fact protects the rights of everyone, including the 'oppressed class'
dude, put it however you want. you're literally saying "fuck the consequences, i want to instill these rights anyway"
*thats anti-consequentialist*
you can put whatever label you want on my opinion, I gave you my reasons
its fairytale stuff
it truly is
but I suppose I generally prioritize means over ends, yes
and we have some of these people elected to congress
how fucked up
so if that makes me an anti-consequentialist, so be it
"too bad if my ideals kill 74 million people, so be it" - mao
and also you
except for the part where Mao was the one willing to justify any means to achieve his ends, liar
mao was trying to instill a MEANS
no, he was trying to create his utopia via whatever means seemed expedient
he wanted his own ideology implemented no matter what the cost
you are literally making my point for me
ideology != good results for humanity
you're stuck to your ideology
as was mao
you don't think you have one?
my thought processes are influenced by consequences, you have admitted that yours arent
sure they are
OH SHIT
<:SWEATSTINY:399640604792848400>
no, I have admitted that I am willing to accept some negative consequences in favor of more important positive ones
also known as "compromise"
you didnt say you thought you would get positive consequences at all, you just added that on right now you snake
hahaha
I remember saying earlier most conservatives have never touched philosophy all be it anecdotal it just keeps happening
I told you what my positive consequence was
liberty
no you didnt
freedom from authoritarian control over my actions and everyone else's
OK, if I failed to do so earlier, I'm doing so now.
uncephalizedToday at 4:48 PM
Ignoring is not the same as accepting as an unfortunate consequence of a more fundamental principle that in fact protects the rights of everyone, including the 'oppressed class'
I thought that was clear enough, but I can clarify if you wish.
you justified ignoring the bad consequences in order to institute a principle
its very clear
@Green Syndicalism Have you considered the consequences of the rights you are trying to institute?