Message from @Green Syndicalism

Discord ID: 612901259158093845


2019-08-19 06:46:08 UTC  

if we're talking about state mandated segregation we oppose that too

2019-08-19 06:46:12 UTC  

#letsDevolveBackToRaceWars

2019-08-19 06:46:36 UTC  

this anti-consequentialist thinking is so retarded for governing the real world

2019-08-19 06:46:36 UTC  

well it would be if all the pop of a state wanted no blacks in their restaurant

2019-08-19 06:46:45 UTC  

but I don't believe it should be illegal to refuse to buy or sell from *anyone*, for *any* reason, including racial prejudice, even though I would lose respect for someone who made that choice

2019-08-19 06:47:11 UTC  

its like these guys live in a deontological fairy land where their idealistic principles matter more than any consequences

2019-08-19 06:47:18 UTC  

yup

2019-08-19 06:47:38 UTC  

it's not anti-consequentialist, I understand that this would lead to real-world examples of discrimination and segregation. I also understand that it would not be a one-way street.

2019-08-19 06:47:48 UTC  

Green have you done the incest argument? I seems to trigger conservatives the most

2019-08-19 06:47:55 UTC  

then you are ignoring these consequences to keep your ideals in play

2019-08-19 06:48:00 UTC  

hence anti-consequentialist

2019-08-19 06:48:15 UTC  

nah

2019-08-19 06:48:45 UTC  

Ignoring is not the same as accepting as an unfortunate consequence of a more fundamental principle that in fact protects the rights of everyone, including the 'oppressed class'

2019-08-19 06:49:37 UTC  

dude, put it however you want. you're literally saying "fuck the consequences, i want to instill these rights anyway"

2019-08-19 06:49:42 UTC  

*thats anti-consequentialist*

2019-08-19 06:50:00 UTC  

you can put whatever label you want on my opinion, I gave you my reasons

2019-08-19 06:50:29 UTC  

its fairytale stuff

2019-08-19 06:50:31 UTC  

it truly is

2019-08-19 06:50:41 UTC  

but I suppose I generally prioritize means over ends, yes

2019-08-19 06:50:42 UTC  

and we have some of these people elected to congress

2019-08-19 06:50:47 UTC  

how fucked up

2019-08-19 06:50:51 UTC  

so if that makes me an anti-consequentialist, so be it

2019-08-19 06:51:14 UTC  

"too bad if my ideals kill 74 million people, so be it" - mao

2019-08-19 06:51:17 UTC  

and also you

2019-08-19 06:51:35 UTC  

except for the part where Mao was the one willing to justify any means to achieve his ends, liar

2019-08-19 06:51:51 UTC  

mao was trying to instill a MEANS

2019-08-19 06:52:14 UTC  

no, he was trying to create his utopia via whatever means seemed expedient

2019-08-19 06:52:16 UTC  

he wanted his own ideology implemented no matter what the cost

2019-08-19 06:52:25 UTC  

you are literally making my point for me

2019-08-19 06:52:45 UTC  

ideology != good results for humanity

2019-08-19 06:52:49 UTC  

you're stuck to your ideology

2019-08-19 06:52:51 UTC  

as was mao

2019-08-19 06:52:56 UTC  

as are you

2019-08-19 06:53:05 UTC  

you don't think you have one?

2019-08-19 06:53:22 UTC  

my thought processes are influenced by consequences, you have admitted that yours arent

2019-08-19 06:53:30 UTC  

sure they are

2019-08-19 06:53:34 UTC  

OH SHIT

2019-08-19 06:53:37 UTC  

<:SWEATSTINY:399640604792848400>

2019-08-19 06:53:52 UTC  

no, I have admitted that I am willing to accept some negative consequences in favor of more important positive ones

2019-08-19 06:53:58 UTC  

also known as "compromise"

2019-08-19 06:54:17 UTC  

you didnt say you thought you would get positive consequences at all, you just added that on right now you snake