Message from @Green Syndicalism
Discord ID: 612901259158093845
if we're talking about state mandated segregation we oppose that too
#letsDevolveBackToRaceWars
this anti-consequentialist thinking is so retarded for governing the real world
well it would be if all the pop of a state wanted no blacks in their restaurant
but I don't believe it should be illegal to refuse to buy or sell from *anyone*, for *any* reason, including racial prejudice, even though I would lose respect for someone who made that choice
its like these guys live in a deontological fairy land where their idealistic principles matter more than any consequences
yup
it's not anti-consequentialist, I understand that this would lead to real-world examples of discrimination and segregation. I also understand that it would not be a one-way street.
Green have you done the incest argument? I seems to trigger conservatives the most
then you are ignoring these consequences to keep your ideals in play
hence anti-consequentialist
nah
Ignoring is not the same as accepting as an unfortunate consequence of a more fundamental principle that in fact protects the rights of everyone, including the 'oppressed class'
dude, put it however you want. you're literally saying "fuck the consequences, i want to instill these rights anyway"
*thats anti-consequentialist*
you can put whatever label you want on my opinion, I gave you my reasons
its fairytale stuff
it truly is
but I suppose I generally prioritize means over ends, yes
and we have some of these people elected to congress
so if that makes me an anti-consequentialist, so be it
"too bad if my ideals kill 74 million people, so be it" - mao
and also you
except for the part where Mao was the one willing to justify any means to achieve his ends, liar
mao was trying to instill a MEANS
no, he was trying to create his utopia via whatever means seemed expedient
he wanted his own ideology implemented no matter what the cost
you are literally making my point for me
ideology != good results for humanity
you're stuck to your ideology
as was mao
as are you
you don't think you have one?
my thought processes are influenced by consequences, you have admitted that yours arent
sure they are
OH SHIT
<:SWEATSTINY:399640604792848400>
no, I have admitted that I am willing to accept some negative consequences in favor of more important positive ones
also known as "compromise"
you didnt say you thought you would get positive consequences at all, you just added that on right now you snake