ah

https://dlive.tv/nickjfuentes?wnt=go_live

now I understand why he said what he said

If you trying to be bored join

OK

changes nothing, but I can at least understand his perspective

@TheCompanyMan Try relaunching discord

That question is a whole can of worms way beyond the scope of the debate

ok will do

What was the question?

is it alright to ask how much experience does Pius have in arguments regarding Godship

Legendary

evidencial moralism doesn't exist

so fondboy's seeking on the subject is actually logically impossible to argue

First thing, never push God onto others...you can let them know but that’s it.

Citation needed, can't just say its true

you can't argue an objective evidence to morality without a divinity

which you can't argue towards in the first place

@myth For Pius, do you think that logic as an a priori has been definitively enough established?

Even if you had a divinity to argue from, you wouldn't be arguing for objective morality....

https://i.imgur.com/yiZeVQN.png o shit Gosar sending secret codes

It would just be subjective to the deity

There are objective morals though.

by divinity I'm not referring to a subject of the mind, by divinity I mean something that is beyond realms of reality and controls that reality

objective morals in 2019 good meme

How do you objectively measure those morals?

that's part of what I'm talking about

@lanceleader thats a whole realm of philsophical debate which does not yet have a definitive answer.

without an objective divinity to define an objective morality, you can't have either

I actually think I believe what @Fondboy position is on this. (Waits for the lightning bolt)

lol

what would that be Frasty

that's what I'm arguing about, which is the problem with asking the question about seeking a enpirical moral framework

Murder is an objective moral.

frosty

@lanceleader That doesn't really answer the question

@lanceleader true because it is by definition unlawful

I need some sort of proof, not words

No, I am not talking about laws. Not murdering is an objective moral.

If you say you want to debate someone on a topic it's up to that person to prove their position. Don't think that was achieved

All I got as an answer was it'sd true