Fasc Mountain

So I did some research

Its possible the guy was legal the whole time, but it would require a huge level of lawyer fuckery

Getting expelled in 2012 would mean he would have to immediately apply for another visa, either an H1B or some other work visa

or get married but there's no evidence he was married from what I can see.

I'm guessing he heard you can get status by serving in the armed services but you HAVE to be a legal resident so he somehow maintained legal status between 2012 and 2015

at that point he's probably eligible for a green card somehow

watching Sargon's video on the Dalai Lama and it got me thinking about the DL's stance, train them then return them, seems like probably a very good option if they're fleeing shitholes why not teach them the skills to improve their home countries

Proof they can learn pls

something the west could do is take on a quote of people from a country to train in exchange for investment in their countries or in exchange for potential trade deals, not just help them fix their own countries but get them on the same side and potentially make money with future trade partners

focusing especially on engineers

A commie dictatorship would see that as subversion via treaty or something

i think it's a good compromise between the extremes of open borders and isolationism

then they can simply fuck off then

If you could make the concept work, it's a great leap forward

it's also something the west could offer countries in Africa to serve as an alternative to chinese influence

it could also be used for training police forces and even military for these countries helping them become more stable

I hate agreeing with the Dalai Lama...

Kony had the right idea then some naked fruit went and ruined it

@Lord Zedd your still making an assumption that the worlds problems are owned by america

i didn't even say America

I wouldn't even pilot the idea there

but it'

s better to have trade partners than dependents seems like this is a way to potentially turn the latter into the former

Okay, sorry i was overly specific. Your assuming a stable countries owes it to a unstable country to improve their situation

no i'm not

I'm assuming that it's better for everyone to have more stable countries

less need for migration then

no need for aid

less need for military

It has never worked before

You dont think buying peace has been attempted

it's not buying peace

So whats in it for the stable country?

it's investing in the future of other countries and it has worked, it's an extension of the US' military philosophy

turn enemies into friends

Japan, Vietnam

You want to help the third world, stop farming subsidies

The west has kept the third world poor delibertly by protectionist policies that actually increase production costs

some western countries already implement the idea on a very small scale, I'm thinking it could be expanded on with a bit more quid pro quo involved

Japan wasnt cheap