Message from @Malign

Discord ID: 540302568107016202


2019-01-30 22:44:44 UTC  

there aren't enough chairs in my comp sci class, so I'm sitting on the floor in the back of the room right now

2019-01-30 22:45:20 UTC  

perfect place for suicide

2019-01-30 22:46:24 UTC  

"Either human life is inherently sacred, or it is not." false dichotomy. you can take the first position without any belief in life being sacred. there are very few pro-lifers who would deny a young woman an abortion for a rape baby

2019-01-30 22:47:01 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428940051896860672/540301944653348884/50973670_10219228372479119_8078857127570964480_n.png

2019-01-30 22:47:08 UTC  

Not a reply to you.

2019-01-30 22:47:09 UTC  

I mean...

2019-01-30 22:47:25 UTC  

why does the rape baby have to die? it ain't its fault

2019-01-30 22:47:31 UTC  

So you can believe that human life is sacred, but you can also believ eit is not?

2019-01-30 22:47:44 UTC  

Sacred is sacred.

2019-01-30 22:47:47 UTC  

INherent is inherent.

2019-01-30 22:47:52 UTC  

"you're assuming my position"

2019-01-30 22:47:54 UTC  

ffs I hate it when people weasel.

2019-01-30 22:48:06 UTC  

no, he was asking a question.

2019-01-30 22:48:14 UTC  

pardon... So 'someone' can believe that a human life is sacred, but 'someone' can also believe it is not sacred?

2019-01-30 22:48:16 UTC  
2019-01-30 22:48:31 UTC  

snow infamously slows down the great parcel migration

2019-01-30 22:48:51 UTC  

I think you shoul dbe more aware of the ethical and religious use of sacred, and also of inherent in terms of philosophy.

2019-01-30 22:48:55 UTC  

there is obviously a continuum where you have life-is-sacred pro-lifers on the edge and limited-case pro-lifers further down the line

2019-01-30 22:49:01 UTC  

Inherent implies that whether you are there, or not, it still is.

2019-01-30 22:49:23 UTC  

And I am arguing that is cognitive disonance, or a lack of proper word usage.

2019-01-30 22:49:30 UTC  

absolutely not

2019-01-30 22:49:38 UTC  

Obviously so.

2019-01-30 22:49:58 UTC  

When a tree falls in a forest, and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?

2019-01-30 22:50:08 UTC  

Soyboy cucks: Dunno.
Science: YES YOU MORONS

2019-01-30 22:51:19 UTC  

pro-lifers don't necessarily believe life is sacred. they simply recognize the rights we afford to beings who come into the world

2019-01-30 22:51:46 UTC  

that's actually bullshit.

2019-01-30 22:52:06 UTC  
2019-01-30 22:52:10 UTC  

I never said they did.

2019-01-30 22:52:12 UTC  

look are you guys incapable of noticing that there are many ways to take the pro-life position? it's not a monolith

2019-01-30 22:52:20 UTC  

i haven't ever seen a prolifer ever claim to not care about the sanctity of life.

2019-01-30 22:52:28 UTC  

You're incapable of separating an ethical argument from a personal stance.

2019-01-30 22:52:34 UTC  

^

2019-01-30 22:52:46 UTC  

That is anecdotal.

2019-01-30 22:52:51 UTC  

For both of you.

2019-01-30 22:53:00 UTC  

unrelated but everytime I read prolifer, it read it as in the beginning of proliferate

2019-01-30 22:53:00 UTC  

i agree

2019-01-30 22:53:02 UTC  

what's anecdotal?

2019-01-30 22:53:37 UTC  

I have argued that *some* argue absolute sacredness of life, and others do not... Those that do not have cognitive dissonance. At least the absolute sacred people are against capital punishment and/or lethal self defense when pressured.

2019-01-30 22:53:45 UTC  

you're a prolifer? dang, I'm only an amateurlifer

2019-01-30 22:53:58 UTC  

better than a journeymanlifer

2019-01-30 22:54:07 UTC  

and i'm here telling you that's a false dichotomy