Message from @Mr. X
Discord ID: 473375637839675392
in other words a soldier, but not the type who's a puppet to war. I'd love to help enforce peace but Im not skilled enough for even the police.
I could do other jobs though since there's plenty that directly help people, I just need to plan on how I'd go about it and then study just for that job since I want only a permanent job.
ideally a job I like and a job that could use for my current and future skills. Jobs that directly help people, not a doctor or fireman or policeman though. But something along those lines.
Any Civil Service job benefits the collective and any charity, eVeN pRiVaTe ChArItY, is a way to spread the message
Leftism and any collectivist ideology only works if you have someone make the first move in doing things as a collective people are naturally to self interested to do things that benefit more than just them. Hence someone has to agitate and make the first step which subconsciously pushes those around them to follow suit.
Who /hegel/ here
@🖤 Limeboo 🖤 Hegel + Ludwig Feuerbach = Marx
@Bagrat I mean directly benefitting them, not the economy. So no I wont give to charities anymore, unless its for a really difficult thing to tackle like disease. Not homelessness and hunger since those are what my taxes will be for. I'll feed the homeless myself so they dont end up dying but if they expect to get a home they need a job. Im not giving them my money to them when I do it through taxes and when it could just go to drugs instead of food.
I dont believe in a stupid collective. The individual is far more important. In order to control a collective you need to make a culture, religion etc. I could care less for a collectivist ideology. Unless it only ensures the survival of society and doesnt involve corruption or a system that can easily be abused like communism.
If your collective is a collective of the homeless you'll likely fail. I'd want free thinkers and skilled people in my work place. Not people who are simply too unfit and too reliant on me.
I dont want my job to only be for helping the homeless either, I want to help anyone I can. I dont want to be limited to just one group, because like I said, I only really care about the individual.
For the most part anyway.
I like how in your imagination you're always the one to hand out money and jobs, never the one who is homeless and starving.
Ooh lucky its not my imagination, my family is rich Simons.
Which means Ill likely not be homeless and starving so I dont care about being homeless and starving atm. Im far more interested in people who currently are and will likely be homeless and starving.
inb4 less unsuccessful people cry about me being rich and expect me to be guilty for being privileged <:GWcorbinTopKek:384871333705678868>
Check your damn privilege shitlord.
Lol
"Haha I'm rich and you aren't you just weren't succesful like me who was born into a rich family"
Insane 200 IQ Fortnite plays here
Well I am successful, I'd be lying if I didnt say being rich didnt help with my successes.
I even said I was lucky to be born in a rich family, but most people have to earn money, hell even my parents want me to work and earn money like they did and I will. The stakes arent high so Ill choose my job carefully.
If the stakes were high then I'd obviously work whatever job I could.
But maybe one day some of you guys will grow richer and make sure your family doesnt risk starving.
It takes a lot of hard work though.
If you dislike interdependency you are gonna hate capitalism my guy
Some of the alt right actually understand this, and call each other wage cuxks
I dont dislike interdependency, I say we rely too much on it.
@Mr. X lol
Cringe
In what ways?
You're cringe
The majority of our social structures is centred around it.
People feel loneliness and simply got mad after being isolated because they can't live without others
we're too social and we're too dependent
what happens when there's no leader to turn to but yourself? Best lead yourself to avoid others tyranny.
This is especially the case in dictatorships, monarchies and democracies.
Republics are good at preventing tyranny in democracies but corruption and tyranny could leak through.
If there's nobody to turn to you must lead yourself. Otherwise you're long gone.
I don't understand what's that go to the with interdependency
Interdependency? Like niggers on the welfare checks?