Message from @「くΣ Σ F Δ Χ 」
Discord ID: 477069923630317589
Who /hegel/ here
@🖤 Limeboo 🖤 Hegel + Ludwig Feuerbach = Marx
@Bagrat I mean directly benefitting them, not the economy. So no I wont give to charities anymore, unless its for a really difficult thing to tackle like disease. Not homelessness and hunger since those are what my taxes will be for. I'll feed the homeless myself so they dont end up dying but if they expect to get a home they need a job. Im not giving them my money to them when I do it through taxes and when it could just go to drugs instead of food.
I dont believe in a stupid collective. The individual is far more important. In order to control a collective you need to make a culture, religion etc. I could care less for a collectivist ideology. Unless it only ensures the survival of society and doesnt involve corruption or a system that can easily be abused like communism.
If your collective is a collective of the homeless you'll likely fail. I'd want free thinkers and skilled people in my work place. Not people who are simply too unfit and too reliant on me.
I dont want my job to only be for helping the homeless either, I want to help anyone I can. I dont want to be limited to just one group, because like I said, I only really care about the individual.
For the most part anyway.
I like how in your imagination you're always the one to hand out money and jobs, never the one who is homeless and starving.
Ooh lucky its not my imagination, my family is rich Simons.
Which means Ill likely not be homeless and starving so I dont care about being homeless and starving atm. Im far more interested in people who currently are and will likely be homeless and starving.
inb4 less unsuccessful people cry about me being rich and expect me to be guilty for being privileged <:GWcorbinTopKek:384871333705678868>
Check your damn privilege shitlord.
Lol
"Haha I'm rich and you aren't you just weren't succesful like me who was born into a rich family"
Insane 200 IQ Fortnite plays here
Well I am successful, I'd be lying if I didnt say being rich didnt help with my successes.
I wasnt saying I earned that money, smartass.
I even said I was lucky to be born in a rich family, but most people have to earn money, hell even my parents want me to work and earn money like they did and I will. The stakes arent high so Ill choose my job carefully.
If the stakes were high then I'd obviously work whatever job I could.
But maybe one day some of you guys will grow richer and make sure your family doesnt risk starving.
It takes a lot of hard work though.
Some of the alt right actually understand this, and call each other wage cuxks
I dont dislike interdependency, I say we rely too much on it.
@Mr. X lol
Cringe
In what ways?
You're cringe
The majority of our social structures is centred around it.
People feel loneliness and simply got mad after being isolated because they can't live without others
we're too social and we're too dependent
what happens when there's no leader to turn to but yourself? Best lead yourself to avoid others tyranny.
This is especially the case in dictatorships, monarchies and democracies.
Republics are good at preventing tyranny in democracies but corruption and tyranny could leak through.
If there's nobody to turn to you must lead yourself. Otherwise you're long gone.
I don't understand what's that go to the with interdependency
Interdependency? Like niggers on the welfare checks?
Oh you mean economic inter dependency. Im not always for it no, but it depends. People need to be paid but also people shouldn't be forced to pay for the poor or healthcare. Too much tax might just force people out of their homes which happens a lot.
That's not what economic interdependency means
This server will be my trolling sever
As you're all fucking dim wits
Not sure if you've realised that already but nearly 50% of the server are various non-leftist trolls.