Message from @fannybandit
Discord ID: 421940224369623051
Yuri best girl
@fannybandit It's impossible to imagine a world without ethics. Morality is in fact a spook.
What do you think ethics is based on?
Morality is the governing dynamic of ethics.
While they are sometimes used interchangeably, they are different: ethics refer to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Morals refer to an individual's own principles regarding right and wrong.
Morality is actually informed by ethics not the other way around.
I'm aware.
No, morality is natural.
Morality can only ever be relative.
If it wasn't, only lawyers would know right from wrong.
Right and wrong is not clear
It's very clear.
No
All you have to ask is "why".
This is exactly why we have due process and a jury.
What about
"why not"
No one ever stood trial for something they didn't do.
Not in that sense
Then in which sense?
Negligence?
A person can violate ethics, however, if people find that their actions were morally sound, they will not be convicted.
Hence ethics deriving from morality.
Wouldn't it be the other way?
No, ethics comes from morality.
Morality is the governing dynamic of ethics.
Morals are subjective you can justify anything morally
What?
Try that again, in English this time.
What
Use a complete thought and/or sentence.
Oh, you made the proper edit.
I should really disabled autocorrect
Fuck
Ok hold on
Yes, you can justify anything that is moral.
Wouldn't morals be different on a person by person basis?
Not by person to person, but by situation to situation.
Hence why we have due process and trial by jury.
Morals are still a spook
It's not like your opinion holds any weight.