No, morality is natural.

Morality can only ever be relative.

If it wasn't, only lawyers would know right from wrong.

Right and wrong is not clear

It's very clear.

No

All you have to ask is "why".

This is exactly why we have due process and a jury.

What about
"why not"

No one ever stood trial for something they didn't do.

Not in that sense

Then in which sense?

Negligence?

A person can violate ethics, however, if people find that their actions were morally sound, they will not be convicted.

Hence ethics deriving from morality.

Wouldn't it be the other way?

No, ethics comes from morality.

Morality is the governing dynamic of ethics.

Morals are subjective you can justify anything morally

What?

Try that again, in English this time.

What

Use a complete thought and/or sentence.

Oh, you made the proper edit.

I should really disabled autocorrect

Fuck

Ok hold on

Yes, you can justify anything that is moral.

Wouldn't morals be different on a person by person basis?

Not by person to person, but by situation to situation.

Hence why we have due process and trial by jury.

https://twitter.com/RunGomez/status/971859411172864001?s=19

Morals are still a spook

It's not like your opinion holds any weight.

My opinion is the only relevant one as this is my world

You're all alone in your world.

My world has over 7 billion people.

How's that for a jury?

Those people are all mine

They can think by themselves

In my perception they are mine