Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 421939038853922825


2018-03-10 07:22:35 UTC  

Without morality, the world would fall into anarchy.

2018-03-10 07:22:49 UTC  

Rule of law could never exist.

2018-03-10 07:23:07 UTC  

The concept of checks and balances would be expelled.

2018-03-10 07:23:42 UTC  

We would inevitably have Armageddon.

2018-03-10 07:23:58 UTC  

Morals are a spook

2018-03-10 07:23:59 UTC  

The only thing that keeps us alive is morality.

2018-03-10 07:24:11 UTC  

Everything other than morality is a spook.

2018-03-10 07:24:50 UTC  

Morality is the reality of humanity.

2018-03-10 07:24:55 UTC  

No

2018-03-10 07:25:01 UTC  

Yes.

2018-03-10 07:25:05 UTC  

No.

2018-03-10 07:25:16 UTC  

Damn

2018-03-10 07:25:21 UTC  

Yes.

2018-03-10 07:25:51 UTC  

It is impossible to imagine a world without morality.

2018-03-10 07:26:10 UTC  

Simply because human being couldn't exist in it.

2018-03-10 07:26:39 UTC  

Morality is God.

2018-03-10 07:41:23 UTC  

@mop or here?

2018-03-10 07:41:27 UTC  

no sto pit

2018-03-10 07:41:29 UTC  

you meme

2018-03-10 07:53:32 UTC  

Yuri best girl

2018-03-10 07:55:06 UTC  

@fannybandit It's impossible to imagine a world without ethics. Morality is in fact a spook.

2018-03-10 07:55:32 UTC  

What do you think ethics is based on?

2018-03-10 07:55:43 UTC  

Morality is the governing dynamic of ethics.

2018-03-10 07:56:07 UTC  

While they are sometimes used interchangeably, they are different: ethics refer to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Morals refer to an individual's own principles regarding right and wrong.

2018-03-10 07:56:21 UTC  

Morality is actually informed by ethics not the other way around.

2018-03-10 07:56:21 UTC  

I'm aware.

2018-03-10 07:56:34 UTC  

No, morality is natural.

2018-03-10 07:56:47 UTC  

Morality can only ever be relative.

2018-03-10 07:56:49 UTC  

If it wasn't, only lawyers would know right from wrong.

2018-03-10 07:57:08 UTC  

Right and wrong is not clear

2018-03-10 07:57:17 UTC  

It's very clear.

2018-03-10 07:57:20 UTC  

No

2018-03-10 07:57:33 UTC  

All you have to ask is "why".

2018-03-10 07:57:45 UTC  

This is exactly why we have due process and a jury.

2018-03-10 07:58:14 UTC  

What about
"why not"

2018-03-10 07:58:32 UTC  

No one ever stood trial for something they didn't do.

2018-03-10 07:58:51 UTC  

Not in that sense

2018-03-10 07:59:04 UTC  

Then in which sense?

2018-03-10 07:59:10 UTC  

Negligence?

2018-03-10 07:59:48 UTC  

A person can violate ethics, however, if people find that their actions were morally sound, they will not be convicted.

2018-03-10 08:00:12 UTC  

Hence ethics deriving from morality.