Message from @sass
Discord ID: 421941570867298315
Then in which sense?
Negligence?
A person can violate ethics, however, if people find that their actions were morally sound, they will not be convicted.
Hence ethics deriving from morality.
Wouldn't it be the other way?
No, ethics comes from morality.
Morality is the governing dynamic of ethics.
Morals are subjective you can justify anything morally
What?
Try that again, in English this time.
What
Use a complete thought and/or sentence.
Oh, you made the proper edit.
I should really disabled autocorrect
Fuck
Ok hold on
Yes, you can justify anything that is moral.
Wouldn't morals be different on a person by person basis?
Not by person to person, but by situation to situation.
Hence why we have due process and trial by jury.
Morals are still a spook
It's not like your opinion holds any weight.
My opinion is the only relevant one as this is my world
You're all alone in your world.
My world has over 7 billion people.
How's that for a jury?
Those people are all mine
They can think by themselves
In my perception they are mine
Luckily your personal perception is irrelevant to reality.
Reality is a spook also
Everything is a spook to you.
True
In reality, you are the spook.
I own myself
So nah
What makes you so sure about that?
I can be changed though
Everyone can be.
I am myself because i work in my own self-interest