Message from @buyXRBpls
Discord ID: 421940561428348929
Morality is actually informed by ethics not the other way around.
I'm aware.
No, morality is natural.
Morality can only ever be relative.
If it wasn't, only lawyers would know right from wrong.
Right and wrong is not clear
It's very clear.
No
All you have to ask is "why".
This is exactly why we have due process and a jury.
What about
"why not"
No one ever stood trial for something they didn't do.
Not in that sense
Then in which sense?
Negligence?
A person can violate ethics, however, if people find that their actions were morally sound, they will not be convicted.
Hence ethics deriving from morality.
Wouldn't it be the other way?
No, ethics comes from morality.
Morality is the governing dynamic of ethics.
What?
Try that again, in English this time.
What
Use a complete thought and/or sentence.
Oh, you made the proper edit.
I should really disabled autocorrect
Fuck
Ok hold on
Yes, you can justify anything that is moral.
Wouldn't morals be different on a person by person basis?
Not by person to person, but by situation to situation.
Hence why we have due process and trial by jury.
Morals are still a spook
It's not like your opinion holds any weight.
My opinion is the only relevant one as this is my world
You're all alone in your world.
My world has over 7 billion people.
How's that for a jury?
Those people are all mine