Message from @Mr. X
Discord ID: 424505772215631880
We dont have english schoolbooks lol
95 aint to bad LD
@Mr.E#2794 the english wrote your history
Except they didnt
too*
Besides for all I know that could be false since a lot of people here are pretty smart
Well idk. There's a lot of people in the country and they're not too bright so who knows?
Doesn't make a difference to me tbh
@Mr.E#2794 you just proved my statements with your comments
Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African.
The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.
In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves.
This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia.
Except Irish slaves didnt exist lol
Its not?
There literally were no Irish slaves
so you want me to call them endentured servants then?
would that make it compute to you ?
Not in America atleast. Maybe a few in medieval times probably but not in America.
I mean sure because endentured servants weren't treated worse than the african slaves
famine lol
why should anyone explain Anything about these infographs you keep sending with no source
LOL
3th
i worship you
@Mr.E#2794 why did you had a famine, the brits own you
offender shut up you crippled fetus
@Suleiman Lol not anymore. We had the famine because there was a disease that fucked up our crops and the brits showed very little support my dude.
@Mr.E#2794 yay
Irish people deserved to die
@Mr.E#2794 dumb ass, the brits allocated land to export. the only thing you fags were allowed was patatoes , then the blight came
why do you thing you have the slur patatoo
@Offender No its because the crops failed dude. Also we had soup but not enough.
Famine didn't start until the crops failed.