Message from @Offender
Discord ID: 424501124817485824
@Mr.E#2794 lol, the irish got creamed by the english, being a irsj service man is like being a fag
Rude
it is ok to pirate games for views 😎
I mean of course they were, the brits had a lot more men and were right beside us. We weren't like America which was a lot further away. No we were right beside them and didn't get to be independent until the early 1900s
But with each loss we couldn't to fight against them during hundreds of years which is pretty admirable to me.
@Mr.E#2794 fags!!!
E kid, just go back watching your television programing https://youtu.be/seHQrI1f748
You'll never beat the Irish.
LOL
gg great comeback my dude
Irish slaves didnt exist
that is what the english schoolbooks tell you
Plus 95 isnt too bad considering if you're under 85 you're pretty much fucked
or near there
We dont have english schoolbooks lol
@Mr.E#2794 the english wrote your history
Except they didnt
too*
Besides for all I know that could be false since a lot of people here are pretty smart
Well idk. There's a lot of people in the country and they're not too bright so who knows?
Doesn't make a difference to me tbh
@Mr.E#2794 you just proved my statements with your comments
Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African.
The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.
In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves.
This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia.
Except Irish slaves didnt exist lol
Its not?
There literally were no Irish slaves
so you want me to call them endentured servants then?
would that make it compute to you ?
Not in America atleast. Maybe a few in medieval times probably but not in America.
I mean sure because endentured servants weren't treated worse than the african slaves
Yeah probably