Message from @Mr. X
Discord ID: 426898470532677672
Totally not communist propaganda at all
I get my archives from the Lord.
True story.
That is honestly more believable than commie propaganda tbh
There's a good reason why the villainous kulaks were liquidated. They were far from innocent, and the poor and middle peasants would agree.
Middle peasants. Lol how to lose an argument in 2 words.
You just proved your ignorance of Russian socioeconomic relations at that time. Middle peasants were a thing.
Marxism is VRAZY
Not a communist
But Marxism is pretty interesting
I know I never said it wasnt
This wasn't a highly advanced western capitalist nation. This was a nation that was evolving out of semi-feudalism.
Which is why soviet socioeconomic relations were retarded
"Peasants" how very non reactionary
How very progressive
What's so reactionary about that? The peasantry was a social class that existed at that time and had it's own divisions.
How is it not reactionary?
I can tell you how it was
"Peasantry"
I mean this is common sense dude
That would be like calling the industrial working class reactionary. Again, this was a nation evolving out of semi-feudalist social relations. The peasantry was a class of agrarian laborers. Just because you're a sperg-lord that only thinks of it as an insult and not an actual social class, doesn't mean it's not a valid socioeconomic descriptor.
No it would be like calling peasantry reactionary.
The industrial working class and peasantry are not the same.
No fucking shit. How is it reactionary?
One chooses to work that way one doesn't have a choice and grows up that way.
I just told you.
Peasantry
like in the medieval times
lol
No, you didn't. Just because the term is used as an insult in the West doesn't take away from the fact that it was a well-established social class in feudal and semi-feudal nations.
dude no wonder communist leaders end up trying to have a dictatorship or monarchy lol
I did
I never said it was because it was an insult
Then how is it reactionary?
Because "peasantry"
Peasantry is reactionary
It's pretty self explanatory tbh
Well I guess that's if you actually studied in school of course
Again, you're assuming that in every context it has a negative connotation. It doesn't. The peasantry was a social class in feudal and semi-feudal nations. The Russian peasants never took offense to the socioeconomic terminology and even had political movements organized around peasants rights.