Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 426897912853823494


2018-03-24 00:08:13 UTC  

I just trust common sense dude

2018-03-24 00:08:24 UTC  

and historical records

2018-03-24 00:08:28 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/426895039919030274/tDZVM0X_3.png

2018-03-24 00:08:50 UTC  

totally not propaganda

2018-03-24 00:09:28 UTC  

totally trustworthy population statistics too

2018-03-24 00:09:38 UTC  

No, it's actually not. Those numbers can be confirmed by the population statistics in the Soviet archives.

2018-03-24 00:09:41 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/426895343448489984/download_21.jpeg

2018-03-24 00:10:06 UTC  

Yeah in the soviet archives 😂

2018-03-24 00:10:39 UTC  

Totally not communist propaganda at all

2018-03-24 00:11:44 UTC  

I get my archives from the Lord.

2018-03-24 00:12:04 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/426895944525545472/this-grain-is-all-mine-nm-share-the-grain-people-15390948.png

2018-03-24 00:12:18 UTC  

True story.

2018-03-24 00:14:00 UTC  

That is honestly more believable than commie propaganda tbh

2018-03-24 00:15:14 UTC  

There's a good reason why the villainous kulaks were liquidated. They were far from innocent, and the poor and middle peasants would agree.

2018-03-24 00:17:16 UTC  

Middle peasants. Lol how to lose an argument in 2 words.

2018-03-24 00:18:35 UTC  

You just proved your ignorance of Russian socioeconomic relations at that time. Middle peasants were a thing.

2018-03-24 00:19:11 UTC  

Marxism is VRAZY

2018-03-24 00:19:24 UTC  

Not a communist

2018-03-24 00:19:34 UTC  

But Marxism is pretty interesting

2018-03-24 00:19:44 UTC  

I know I never said it wasnt

2018-03-24 00:19:53 UTC  

This wasn't a highly advanced western capitalist nation. This was a nation that was evolving out of semi-feudalism.

2018-03-24 00:20:06 UTC  

Which is why soviet socioeconomic relations were retarded

2018-03-24 00:20:40 UTC  

"Peasants" how very non reactionary

2018-03-24 00:21:00 UTC  

How very progressive

2018-03-24 00:21:07 UTC  

What's so reactionary about that? The peasantry was a social class that existed at that time and had it's own divisions.

2018-03-24 00:21:39 UTC  

How is it not reactionary?

2018-03-24 00:21:53 UTC  

I can tell you how it was

2018-03-24 00:22:00 UTC  

"Peasantry"

2018-03-24 00:22:06 UTC  

As simple as that

2018-03-24 00:22:21 UTC  

I mean this is common sense dude

2018-03-24 00:24:16 UTC  

That would be like calling the industrial working class reactionary. Again, this was a nation evolving out of semi-feudalist social relations. The peasantry was a class of agrarian laborers. Just because you're a sperg-lord that only thinks of it as an insult and not an actual social class, doesn't mean it's not a valid socioeconomic descriptor.

2018-03-24 00:24:39 UTC  

No it would be like calling peasantry reactionary.

2018-03-24 00:24:53 UTC  

The industrial working class and peasantry are not the same.

2018-03-24 00:25:07 UTC  

No fucking shit. How is it reactionary?

2018-03-24 00:25:10 UTC  

One chooses to work that way one doesn't have a choice and grows up that way.

2018-03-24 00:25:21 UTC  

I just told you.

2018-03-24 00:25:23 UTC  

Peasantry

2018-03-24 00:25:31 UTC  

like in the medieval times

2018-03-24 00:25:33 UTC  

lol

2018-03-24 00:26:15 UTC  

No, you didn't. Just because the term is used as an insult in the West doesn't take away from the fact that it was a well-established social class in feudal and semi-feudal nations.

2018-03-24 00:26:27 UTC  

dude no wonder communist leaders end up trying to have a dictatorship or monarchy lol