Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 426899710306025482


2018-03-24 00:21:00 UTC  

How very progressive

2018-03-24 00:21:07 UTC  

What's so reactionary about that? The peasantry was a social class that existed at that time and had it's own divisions.

2018-03-24 00:21:39 UTC  

How is it not reactionary?

2018-03-24 00:21:53 UTC  

I can tell you how it was

2018-03-24 00:22:00 UTC  

"Peasantry"

2018-03-24 00:22:06 UTC  

As simple as that

2018-03-24 00:22:21 UTC  

I mean this is common sense dude

2018-03-24 00:24:16 UTC  

That would be like calling the industrial working class reactionary. Again, this was a nation evolving out of semi-feudalist social relations. The peasantry was a class of agrarian laborers. Just because you're a sperg-lord that only thinks of it as an insult and not an actual social class, doesn't mean it's not a valid socioeconomic descriptor.

2018-03-24 00:24:39 UTC  

No it would be like calling peasantry reactionary.

2018-03-24 00:24:53 UTC  

The industrial working class and peasantry are not the same.

2018-03-24 00:25:07 UTC  

No fucking shit. How is it reactionary?

2018-03-24 00:25:10 UTC  

One chooses to work that way one doesn't have a choice and grows up that way.

2018-03-24 00:25:21 UTC  

I just told you.

2018-03-24 00:25:23 UTC  

Peasantry

2018-03-24 00:25:31 UTC  

like in the medieval times

2018-03-24 00:25:33 UTC  

lol

2018-03-24 00:26:15 UTC  

No, you didn't. Just because the term is used as an insult in the West doesn't take away from the fact that it was a well-established social class in feudal and semi-feudal nations.

2018-03-24 00:26:27 UTC  

dude no wonder communist leaders end up trying to have a dictatorship or monarchy lol

2018-03-24 00:26:35 UTC  

I did

2018-03-24 00:26:53 UTC  

I never said it was because it was an insult

2018-03-24 00:27:02 UTC  

Then how is it reactionary?

2018-03-24 00:27:16 UTC  

Because "peasantry"

2018-03-24 00:27:26 UTC  

Peasantry is reactionary

2018-03-24 00:28:15 UTC  

It's pretty self explanatory tbh

2018-03-24 00:28:27 UTC  

Well I guess that's if you actually studied in school of course

2018-03-24 00:28:38 UTC  

Again, you're assuming that in every context it has a negative connotation. It doesn't. The peasantry was a social class in feudal and semi-feudal nations. The Russian peasants never took offense to the socioeconomic terminology and even had political movements organized around peasants rights.

2018-03-24 00:28:47 UTC  

It does

2018-03-24 00:28:49 UTC  

What makes it reactionary

2018-03-24 00:28:55 UTC  

Peasantry

2018-03-24 00:29:10 UTC  

No, it doesn't. You're talking out of your ass. Your logic doesn't add up. Admit you're mistaken and move on.

2018-03-24 00:29:15 UTC  

what about peasantry makes it reactionary

2018-03-24 00:29:33 UTC  

A peasant is a pre-industrial agricultural laborer or farmer, especially one living in the Middle Ages under feudalism and paying rent, tax, fees or services to a landlord.

2018-03-24 00:29:46 UTC  

tru

2018-03-24 00:29:50 UTC  

Okay? And?

2018-03-24 00:30:02 UTC  

"especially one living in the Middle Ages"

2018-03-24 00:30:11 UTC  

What

2018-03-24 00:30:39 UTC  

"middle ages"

2018-03-24 00:30:45 UTC  

Hm

2018-03-24 00:30:56 UTC  

Yeah, the peasantry was widespread in the middle ages and was virtually non-existent in Europe post-industrial revolution. They still existed in the East, however.

2018-03-24 00:31:09 UTC  

Which is rather primitive

2018-03-24 00:31:38 UTC  

As many places like Russia still had not done away with feudalism entirely.