Good analysis of the debate

https://youtu.be/RY3faiBVEBw

FACEandLMS vs Sargon of Akkad next.

Measure the nose! Measure the nose!

Also, Sargon is wrong about Incels hosting on women. A lot of incels I've spoken to such as Turkish Cutecel doesn't hate women nor does FACEandLMS they just want an into it relationship. It's just that women are more looks hypergamous and want to date up the looks pyramid. They only use money and status as Beta Bucks.

>Turkish Cutecel

https://tenor.com/view/steve-harvey-shocked-terkejut-kaget-suprised-gif-12174657

I think people these days watch too much tv, movies, and porn. They develop an ideal mate in their head, and they seek that person out. Regardless that that person doesnt exist. Women want a 6'2 man with a barrel chest and a 6 pack. Or a 200k a year job etc. Men want a porn star with huge tits and a fat ass. People have these superflous checklists that they never consider theyre missing out on perfectly wonderful people that will check boxes that are far more important.

nah

it's the pill

femoids can now work and earn money, but still expect men to earn more (whilst simultaneously complaining about it)
destruction of nuclear family and of the long term monogamous relationship - which is not our primal state and needs to be enforced by social pressure

so basically, relationships are kinda fucked, so many people just don't bother

Well, I’m all for flat women

😳😳😳

What do flats have to do with anything?

Im for women without penises

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

@leavethisbotnet point is, not everybody has an unrealistic standard due to porn

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck eeeeh, I know legal lolis are a thing, but I'd still call that an unrealistic standard

Not legal lolis

Women who look like adults, but are flat

Or Tomboys <:ahegao:462286952335671296>

Thinking flat must always be loli

"Unrealistic standard due to porn"? Well, the wonders of capitalism can make a man more attractive to a woman, it can also make a woman more attractive to a man. Fair game.

It's mostly bullshit anyways

Honestly, if porn *is* influencing the matter at hand, it's impact is comparatively insignificant to other factors.

So i was just messing around with random figures on the electoral calculus and i found this result.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5ZX6iCBm6U

...and I in return CRINGE at him.

That video predates the debate. It's from last summer.

Probably the reason they even had the debate, as Vaush seemed pretty obsessed.

Well shit

Anyway progressives seem obsessed about sargon

2 hours of him screaming that Sargon is literal nazi, Gamergate was literally fascist movement, all the corruption in games media was nothing (and lets not talk about coordinated articles about death of gamers), etc.

Apparently somewhere in the recent Sargon vs Vaush debate, Vaush basically claimed that you cannot be anti-SJW without being a nazi. I wonder at which timestamp that topic was handled...

Because it's ironic, as nazism is basically "social justice for Aryan people".... so if anti-SJWs are nazi, then anti-SJW are SJWs. If you are against SJWs you are SJW. If you on the other hand are pro SJW, does that perhaps make you against SJW thus a nazi?

But, it's funny how Vaush and Alt-Right do agree that to be against the left, you need to be a nazi. Only the center disagrees on the necessity to be identitarianism (and just picking the "right" team).

he called that out later on

like in the last 30minutes of him being in the stream

basically he said it was a conspiracy that tech companies and media outlets are SJWish