hey uhm...

Shut the fuck up

You think you can just willy nilly your way in here and bother people with your stupid shit?

yeah I cna

Shut up you furry

nooooooo why u take my shobon

go back to the barky boy

<:comfort:592107824826417204> this is a fur free zone

Fantastic

What a god damn Chad

wat

it's a reference to another comic

http://attrition.org/misc/keywords.html

Bro you posted cringe

get in the cringe zone

Criiiiiinge!

@Jokerfaic UBI is just welfare with a different name. Change my mind.

welfare is means-tested

UBI can be seen as a form of keynesian economic stimulus

keynesian economics has been disproven

lol

like, entirely

if you want to argue for UBI, do it on other terms

I am skeptical but can buy this idea that keynesian style economics has been superceded but if you start coming out with the old bullshit I'm just gonna laugh

what Keynes mistakenly saw was in fact this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_deflation

new classical is ofc the best economic theory groundwork-wise

are you for UBI by any chance? I'm curious what kind of arguments can be made for it in other systems of economic theory

no I am not

but it is perhaps the least retarded form of welfare

alternatively, negative income tax

which was, ironically, proposed by Milton Friedman

UBI has no purpose in macro theory. wealth inequality makes little sense in terms of economic growth. Micro, however, UBI would increase personal utility over welfare for specific things

tho he simply mused upon the idea, and did not support it necessarily

Yeah in macro, the only question created by UBI would be: where does the UBI money come from? If taxation, normal rules apply. Else, then its possible you could fund it via a MMT model of alternate currency generation.

macroeconomics is not very meaningful tbh, esp on its own

and new classical recognizes this