It's just basic data analytics

the only female i can think of that i legitimately respect is ayn rand, and she only gets like a B- grade

if sexism is wrong then where the fuck are the heavy hitting female thinkers/leaders

And people can't be fucked to put in any effort

Ayn rand was just horny for rich guys

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.realitytitbit.com%2Fstatic%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F08%2F16239718-low_res-dragons-den-1-1-e1547368313198.jpg&f=1&nofb=1 scratch that, two women I want to sit on my face

I only read the wikipedia page but Ayn rand kinda seems like a meme

She is trash

pretty much

I have no respect for her

Back in the cage

Kitchen*

i give objectivism as a whole a B-

MA luvs him so i dont wanna know

solid effort, missing alot, minor penchant for smallbraining

TBH It would be difficult to have a large enough sample size for women only and then it would be a case of what metric do you divide those who were successful and failures

Well I see this convo

I would say global or international would have to be the line 🤔

nigga

is heading steeply into incel territory

@Storin Do you count voicing like half the videogame characters succesful?

they are 50% of the population

50% of the population is not 50% of the leaders

also I think its 51% that are women <:shrug:349342983763656705>

leaders/philosophers are indicative of the higher functioning members of a population in a free society

if 50% femal doent give 50% female leaders

then hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Yes but did they get there by merit or by virtue/curse of being a female

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/518798189982384169/652282123612323840/1549884467227.png

Allot of women recognize that raising kids is the most important thing in their lives so instead of becoming political or economic leaders they become leaders in child development

oh ofcourse

Like legit there are allot of smart women who are on medicine and child development

Yes but for the ones who do go onto be leaders are they leaders because they earned it or they were put forwards for it because they are women

But the angry spiteful women are the ones who try to become ceos

Did sarah wojicki for example become leader of Youtube because she was the best or was it politically expedient to do so

im kind of implying when you take each statement piece by piece but really im just talking about my personal sense of respect

And those are those are the foolish women

Big Ben is under repairs rn. It cant even make a sound

And if it was the latter could that explain things such as COPPA passing and being enforced on digital media such as youtube

Which is why they fail