Technocracy has not been killed because it hasn't existed. Just because democracy is more powerful doesn't mean it is the only option.

Technocracy is better so it should be striven for

If it hasn't existed then it's only better on paper. And paper is worthless.

Just look at communism.

Everyone says it's fucking stellar on paper until you start ethnically cleansing the kulaks.

Get back to me when a country actually installs a technocracy.

@DrRisen you do realize democracy was once on paper.

If people don't think it's better on paper then why would they install it?

You're too concerned with now. Typical materialist. Bye

@Deleted User Democracy was once on paper, and I would be just as unconfident with it as I would be with technocracy now.

But right now democracy isn’t, and technocracy is.

Technocracy is, at a base level, unproven.

It’s on you and your affiliates to prove it, not me.

And I only didn’t respond because unlike some people *I have a life outside of discord.*

technocracy?

😬

primitivism is the best

@DrRisen the last part wasn't referring to you mot responding. It was referring to how you seem to only care about what is happening now, not what could happen and what has.

@Deleted User I'm absolutely concerned about what has happened. I.E. kulaks getting slaughtered.

I'm not saying technocracy is *bad*, I'm saying it needs to be proven to work in a real life scenario before it has any weight behind it.

Ok then

Technocracy works

Look at China

@Normal Man it's called capital flight

Same thing happened to France

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

- Should the sale of fossil fuel cars eventually be banned or phased out? When should the sale of new fossil fuel cars be banned?

https://futurism.com/these-7-countries-want-to-say-goodbye-to-fossil-fuel-based-cars

phased out

depends when eventually is

Honestly the sooner the better, air pollution is a major issue

once 70% of cars daily used are non-fossil fuel

then you can go for a full on ban I guess

@Deleted User Name your date, UK wants a ban by 2040

Others by 2030

I'd say 2040 is realistic

also I think it should be a forced buy back not a ban

Should be carbon taxed to hell to such a degree that it's cheaper to go renewable than to pay tax

You guys can easily talk about it but hello, I am Bulgarian, most people here use cars before 2005 because they have no money for newer cars, what is left for the electric ones. How should we travel? By bicycles?

thats why I said buy back

and the point of waiting so long is so that hopefully electric cars will become cheaper and more viable

Thank God we are a capitalist country as capitalism makes you richer