@DrRisen woah your arguments are so convincing

It's not an argument, it's a statement of fact.

Democracy is the most powerful governmental system in the word, end of story.

Technocracy is superior as it means government is controlled by specialists. I.e. the economy is controlled by economists not just any one who is elected.

/*better

Not superior

Power doesn't equal good @DrRisen

Did I say it did?

You know what I fucking mean

Humor me.

No you didn't. So Democracy has more power. Irrelevant. Technocracy is better.

Do you dispute that Technocracy is better?

@DrRisen

I don't dispute it, nor do I endorse it, as that was not my point. @Deleted User

Well my point is democracy is a worse system

Because irrelevant of which system is "better" at this point democracy is the best option that remains, because it kills all other options.

Including Technocracy.

Unless a real life meme occurs and SIEGE actually happens.

Which I doubt will happen.

Technocracy has not been killed because it hasn't existed. Just because democracy is more powerful doesn't mean it is the only option.

Technocracy is better so it should be striven for

If it hasn't existed then it's only better on paper. And paper is worthless.

Just look at communism.

Everyone says it's fucking stellar on paper until you start ethnically cleansing the kulaks.

Get back to me when a country actually installs a technocracy.

@DrRisen you do realize democracy was once on paper.

If people don't think it's better on paper then why would they install it?

You're too concerned with now. Typical materialist. Bye

@Deleted User Democracy was once on paper, and I would be just as unconfident with it as I would be with technocracy now.

But right now democracy isn’t, and technocracy is.

Technocracy is, at a base level, unproven.

It’s on you and your affiliates to prove it, not me.

And I only didn’t respond because unlike some people *I have a life outside of discord.*

technocracy?

😬

primitivism is the best

@DrRisen the last part wasn't referring to you mot responding. It was referring to how you seem to only care about what is happening now, not what could happen and what has.

@Deleted User I'm absolutely concerned about what has happened. I.E. kulaks getting slaughtered.

I'm not saying technocracy is *bad*, I'm saying it needs to be proven to work in a real life scenario before it has any weight behind it.

Ok then

Technocracy works