Message from @urban

Discord ID: 540701499207188501


2019-02-01 01:10:49 UTC  

@Deleted User It fails to control itself for the sake of society

2019-02-01 01:10:54 UTC  

There's always been many of these factors

2019-02-01 01:11:00 UTC  

Name a system that does

2019-02-01 01:11:10 UTC  

There's almost always been private property, voluntary exchange, etc.

2019-02-01 01:11:13 UTC  

Competition

2019-02-01 01:11:21 UTC  

Capitalism is just free markets

2019-02-01 01:11:26 UTC  

where previously they were controlled

2019-02-01 01:11:31 UTC  

That's not the definition.

2019-02-01 01:12:00 UTC  

Well, we agree that Capitalism hasn't always existed, but its parts have.

2019-02-01 01:12:26 UTC  

I am not in favor of laissez faire

2019-02-01 01:12:46 UTC  

Or anarchy

2019-02-01 01:12:49 UTC  

Well what is Capitalism to you?

2019-02-01 01:12:57 UTC  

Any system with private means of production?

2019-02-01 01:13:00 UTC  

The definition I posted

2019-02-01 01:13:00 UTC  

Markets?

2019-02-01 01:13:16 UTC  

Okay

2019-02-01 01:13:25 UTC  

So I'd disagree where everything is left to the market

2019-02-01 01:13:30 UTC  

I find very little not to like

2019-02-01 01:13:40 UTC  

Previously the state would regulate things to suit the society

2019-02-01 01:14:14 UTC  

There is nothing in the definition that specifies that under capitalism the state can't regulate the market. In fact, the state does so right now in capitalist countries.

2019-02-01 01:14:43 UTC  

Well here we have a problem

2019-02-01 01:14:50 UTC  

The an cap wet dream doesn't exist in modern times. Pretty much every capitalist country has regulation

2019-02-01 01:15:02 UTC  

I'm not just talking about regulation

2019-02-01 01:15:31 UTC  

Well, not regulation as it's usually understood

2019-02-01 01:15:41 UTC  

I think pre-capitalist economies are worth looking at

2019-02-01 01:16:53 UTC  

I mean if you want to call me a capitalist because I'm not a natsoc, or a socialist, or a marxist, go ahead. But I think there's a fundamental problem with defining capitalism so loosely

2019-02-01 01:17:26 UTC  

I went from libertarian to alt right reactionary to realizing that a lot of the ideas I was toying with were genuinely dumb and I needed to ground myself in reality. Socialism is pretty shitty

2019-02-01 01:18:28 UTC  

People in these circles just throw around the term capitalism as this bogeyman that has no clear definition.

2019-02-01 01:18:37 UTC  

I'm not a socialist

2019-02-01 01:18:46 UTC  

There's not just socialism and capitalism

2019-02-01 01:18:52 UTC  

I am aware.

2019-02-01 01:19:55 UTC  

If you want to call me a capitalist in favor of heavy regulation go ahead, but "Capitalism" implies a lot of things I'm not

2019-02-01 01:20:02 UTC  

I'm more of a distributist

2019-02-01 01:21:03 UTC  

I favor guilds over complete free trade. I favor decentralization of the economy by the state. But I still believe in private property

2019-02-01 01:23:51 UTC  

How does capitalism imply a lot of things you're not?

2019-02-01 01:24:11 UTC  

"I favor guilds over complete free trade" capitalism is not "complete" free trade

2019-02-01 01:24:55 UTC  

The way I see it you belong to a big tent of capitalism but you're a special kind of capitalist who has a specific vision in mind

2019-02-01 01:25:01 UTC  

as am I

2019-02-01 01:25:36 UTC  

I suppose if that's how you want to define capitalism. But at that point it pretty much includes every society with private property

2019-02-01 01:26:35 UTC  

I'm not defining it my way. I just defer to the definition people accept:
Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit.

2019-02-01 01:26:41 UTC  

Yeah at that point fascist corporatism would be considered capitalism due to the existence of private Enterprise