Yes I know

I never said it didn’t

However the USSR was a socialist economy

State owned the MoP

Okay, so name a socialist pre-Stalin that said market intervention was socialism

You named the USSR

if you know a lot about socialism

Just give me a name

They probably didn’t say anything like that, they just wanted to abolish the market.

As Marx said aswell, socialism was the transition to communism

Socialism was set into place to abolish the market

Name a socialist who defined socialism as the state simply owning the means of production

By using interventionist methods

Marx wouldn't have seen the USSR as socialist

Probably would have

of

production

interventionism is abolishing the market forced

intervention is not owning means of production

Socialism isn’t just means of production owned by the state or workers

it also wants the market abolished

and also to secure the workers owning the MoP, the state must intervene.

its anything realted to state dealing with economic affairs of the state

It wants laisses faire economics gone....Market Socialism is a thing

If socialism is owning the mop, then regulation is not socialism if they don't own it

Yes it also wants to abolish the free market

Through state intervention

hence any intervention is socialist

Regulation is often done with the intent of making the market fairer. Be that an ineffective policy, it's not socialism even with this retarded definition @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Market interventions are not incompatible with capitalism
You do know Keynesian economics is a thing right?

Yes and it’s not capitalism

This guy thinks Pinochet was socialist

@The Big Oof nope

okay wait WHAT

Right

It reduced the market forced

I think I remember Sid. He's a retard.

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ According to your retarded logic he was

So was Adam smith a capitalist?

woah woah

There’s too many people@here