Dude only westerners like capitalism

You’re kidding yourself

Oddly enough the United States is a western country populated by western people

I’m unsure how you feel this supports your argument

Welcome @queenis!

A little bit of both I think. I think we are born with a certain personality that makes us different, but we obviously grow and change as people.

Interesting question.

It’s both. We are born with a DNA that gives us some part of our personality, but we also learn from experiences.

I'd agree with that.

Yeah hey guys

Howdy @Andreas der Deutsche @SirGarretOfAA @SultanPistachios . Welcome to the Nationalist Union. If you want ranks go to <#507040923884978176> and use ?ranks to see all available ranks and use ?rank enterrankname so that you can join one be sure to check out our <#507040801860091914> and <#521916756852342784>

Also what a retarded debate topic, our experiences change our visions of the world

Do a prostitute(the one who has to sell her body to survive) was born to be a prostitute?

@𝕿𝖔𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 𝕲𝖗𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖉𝖉𝖉𝖞 Thank you. I'll see how I can help myself out here.

i wanna do a partneship

A little bit of both, but mostly genetics. Twins often have very similar personalities and beliefs, for example.

@CronoSaturn intresting topic I'd say this is a one answer question. Our nature and paths of thinking are made at birth, but the brain evolves all the time and as a person you'll always grow and evolve your mind.

Most people seem to be saying that you are born into yourself and then shaped further by your experiences. Some things to consider here, at which point, if any, do those differences become sufficient to say you are a different person to who you were born as?

As time progresses we also see an increased capacity to alter our DNA. Does doing so make us different people? Or when chosen is it merely the manifestation of the person we have become?

I don't think we ever will be able to change our DNA. That seems extremly advance probeply impossile.

We also share a great deal of genetic material and experiences as common, should this common heritage be considered part of us as individuals, or as part of the human condition?

🤔

Have a look at CRISPR as a technology. How it will mature is yet to be seen but certainly there are those in the field who believe that it may have that capacity and are exploring developing that capability

China has been in hot water with the ethics committees of a number of scientific boards for using the technology to alter the germ line of both adults and human foetuses

"Some things to consider here, at which point, if any, do those differences become sufficient to say you are a different person to who you were born as?" Sounds very metaphysical... the terms me and you have little meaning outside of human experience so it is hard to say when one person becomes a different one because you don't know what constitutes you in the first place.

Is there any place for "me" in the everchaning world?

I will get back to it on this tipic surely!! Gotta go now tho!

Whether we “know” in a hard sense does not preclude a discussion where we evaluate the merits and flaws with how we understand these questions however.

I think your second question is an interesting one. How important is the self in society? To what extent should it be protected or be forced to conform?

Ill look forward to hearing your views when you have the chance

@CronoSaturn we grow.

@Aki sup

I mean sure we can say that when I was an embryo, I was still me and from that moment till now it's been me all along, all the same person, but that person has been growing obviously

It's a philosophical thing I suppose it's a matter of opinion

Well to varying degrees, of course its very difficult to pin down a single view as the question is deliberately vague and so without knowing exactly how people define their terms, their reasoning etc but we can try and discuss these to try and understand the positions of others and ourselves to a greater degree
Plus fuck it, I find it fun to talk about

https://spectator.us/womens-sports-consist-men/

Re you as an embryo progressing to you as you are now though @snakeeater, obviously you share very little in common with yourself as an embryo. Obviously you are a lot bigger then you were then, you can understand language, etc. If someone were to hire you and had a foetus delivered to them instead obviously that wouldnt be what they wanted. In what way is it accurate then to say that you are the same thing?

@CronoSaturn It however can influence where this discussion goes and establishing this basic principle gives the discussion meaning that it otherwise lacks... but addressing your second question... the way I see it society ought to be built on human nature... so self should be protected as long as its individual interests are not aimed at undermining this order... and self should also be actively encouraged to strenghten the order. When it comes to CRISPR... I think its usage should be limited only to strictly medical purposes and nothing more. I hope it is vague enough because in reality I think it would be more productive to talk about specific examples instead of trying to establish general rules that will surely have to fail when confronted with practical examples
@snakeeater Hi hi
Hmm... but what in this embryo constitutes you? Atoms in the human body, for example, are totally replaced with new ones every several years due to metabolic processes.

@CronoSaturn @Aki because that embryo and I have the same genes

The only difference between us is time and experiences