Message from @Northern Lights
Discord ID: 639749248795279370
Is so CA can have their faggot gun laws and over there can have .50 machine guns
if you mean centralization of power, yeah it is a bit of a problem but honestly we asked for it
Because that's what the people in each state respectively want
Dems are like
Nah nigga
Ban them everywhere
no one wants to spend the money on taxes for 50 seperate gov depts, one for each state, that do the same thing
They don't even have the conception anymore and I think its because of how globalist in general the left is
we do that anyways
but the point is that if you do it yourself, you don't become dependant on the Federal Gov
Ie the left in every nation are quite similar
Want the same things
yeah, remember that the US gov used to encourage civilians to own cannons
so they gov could use them in time of war
federal regulation is important for things like agriculture, engineering, etc... some federal power is important but not excessive federal power
anyone that uses the 'didn't mean weapons that could kill people' is full of shit
an AR-15 cannot disembowl a person
They literally meant
an cannon from 1850 can
Whatever weapon is required to overthrow a tyrannical gov
that is also not really the reason
Yeah yeah more about if the brits return
if the Constitution is followed, the Federal gov can never GET to the point to oppress the States
@Northern Lights I agree but they didnt really account for the insane technological advancements in warfare
so the notion that guns are for preventing the federal gov from imposing their will is also a common fallacy
Yeah I've been thinking about that
i think they did
that is why the States were supposed to have the majority of control over their own affairs
personalised nuclear device when
regardless of tech advances
not soon enough <:why:462286147473637407>
Maybe some sort of system where its scaled up to militias so they can own stuff rather then the individuals because I see the argument against the private ownership of anti air missiles for example
i don't
understand that conceding to the notion that individuals aren't responsible enough to control various tech IS the reason we are in this mess
private ownership of tactical nukes
The catch 22 is
groups of people are even LESS responsible
There is an increase in violence
and eventually, in order to keep people from owning person nukes, the State WILL have to become totalitarian
Kids didn't used to shoot schools up