Look at the dems

The whole point of the states

federalisation? how do you mean?

Is so CA can have their faggot gun laws and over there can have .50 machine guns

if you mean centralization of power, yeah it is a bit of a problem but honestly we asked for it

Because that's what the people in each state respectively want

Dems are like

Nah nigga

Ban them everywhere

no one wants to spend the money on taxes for 50 seperate gov depts, one for each state, that do the same thing

They don't even have the conception anymore and I think its because of how globalist in general the left is

we do that anyways

but the point is that if you do it yourself, you don't become dependant on the Federal Gov

Ie the left in every nation are quite similar

Want the same things

yeah, remember that the US gov used to encourage civilians to own cannons

so they gov could use them in time of war

federal regulation is important for things like agriculture, engineering, etc... some federal power is important but not excessive federal power

anyone that uses the 'didn't mean weapons that could kill people' is full of shit

an AR-15 cannot disembowl a person

They literally meant

an cannon from 1850 can

Whatever weapon is required to overthrow a tyrannical gov

Where my Abrams @?

that is also not really the reason

Yeah yeah more about if the brits return

if the Constitution is followed, the Federal gov can never GET to the point to oppress the States

@Northern Lights I agree but they didnt really account for the insane technological advancements in warfare

so the notion that guns are for preventing the federal gov from imposing their will is also a common fallacy

Yeah I've been thinking about that

i think they did

that is why the States were supposed to have the majority of control over their own affairs

personalised nuclear device when

regardless of tech advances

not soon enough <:why:462286147473637407>

Maybe some sort of system where its scaled up to militias so they can own stuff rather then the individuals because I see the argument against the private ownership of anti air missiles for example

i don't

understand that conceding to the notion that individuals aren't responsible enough to control various tech IS the reason we are in this mess

private ownership of tactical nukes

The catch 22 is

groups of people are even LESS responsible