Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 640569973982494721
Coolitic, it depends. You have the right to tell them to leave, and if they refuse, you can use escalating force, but the law asks you to do the most reasonable course of action in pursuit of that
ok
then why do security guards
call cops
is CIVIL law, a husband, a man working for an LLC and his wife are SEPERATE entiites
this includes contract law
Cuz they aren't trained
bruh
they are NOT allowed to testify on behalf of each other in civil law
MA, I'm using corporation in a different sense than you are
they ARE in criminal
they should make citizen's arrests the 11th bill of rights
T-E-S-T-I-F-Y
not represent
"Husband and wife are considered one mind in law." ~ Legal maxim
but that doesn't apply in contract law
they are seprate and distinct
that only applies in criminal law
If Coke buys Pepsi and they have a corporate merger, can Pepsi testify against Coke? That's like testifying against yourself. That is why they can't, cuz you can't force someone to self-incriminate
you aren't hearing me
listen to what i said; your example is inverted. in criminal law, the state treats certain parties as the SAME person
@Coolitic They CAN, but do they want the risk and the liability is the question. Most of the legal realm deals with liability.
in civil law this is NOT the case
also
duty to retreat
Is there a question in there, MA?
is the gayest concept on the planet
Duty to retreat is bullshit. Stand your ground should be universal law of the land
how does your coke and pepsi example apply?
"A man's home is his castle." ~ Legal Maxim
Maxim is a men's magazine
not a legal magazine
😉
```
Stand Your Ground: No duty to retreat from the situation before resorting to deadly force; not limited to your home, place of work, etc.
Castle Doctrine: No duty to retreat before using deadly force if you are in your home or yard (some states include place of work and occupied vehicles).
Duty to Retreat: Duty to retreat from a threatening situation if you can do so with complete safety.
```
yeah, that kinda leaves one open to become an unintended baliee though
if they set up the scene beforehand by throwing something on your property and you have no clue it is theirs.....
It's an analogy, MA. The man is like Coke and the woman is like Pepsi. For legal purposes, you are considered a "person," in this case a "natural person." A person is just a legal construct. To wit: a corporation sole, which the law views as having certain rights. What we commonly call corporations, trusts, companies, etc. are called "artificial persons," "legal persons," or "juristic persons."
When you get married, these two natural persons, these two corporations, merge to become one legal entity. One mind. It's presumed they do so voluntarily and agree on all the consequences and act as one unit. This is why spousal privilege is recognized, cuz again, you can't force someone to testify against themselves (they have to do so voluntarily).
In civil law, there is no incrimination. It's just dealing with torts and contracts, so a spouse is just like any other witness.
I have caught a queen waspp
This is the same reason "corporate personhood" is a thing
again, ANSWER the question i asked
not the question YOU wish