Message from @Coolitic
Discord ID: 640569471681167380
just generalize it to property contracts in general honestly
is it legal or is it not?
Legal and lawful are two different things
correct
and morality isn't a function of the state
I'd still like an answer to my question
I don't waste my time in the weeds of legality when I can take the high ground of law and morality.
wait, your statement above contradicts mine
Coolitic, it depends. You have the right to tell them to leave, and if they refuse, you can use escalating force, but the law asks you to do the most reasonable course of action in pursuit of that
ok
then why do security guards
call cops
is CIVIL law, a husband, a man working for an LLC and his wife are SEPERATE entiites
this includes contract law
Cuz they aren't trained
bruh
they are NOT allowed to testify on behalf of each other in civil law
MA, I'm using corporation in a different sense than you are
they ARE in criminal
T-E-S-T-I-F-Y
not represent
"Husband and wife are considered one mind in law." ~ Legal maxim
but that doesn't apply in contract law
they are seprate and distinct
that only applies in criminal law
If Coke buys Pepsi and they have a corporate merger, can Pepsi testify against Coke? That's like testifying against yourself. That is why they can't, cuz you can't force someone to self-incriminate
you aren't hearing me
listen to what i said; your example is inverted. in criminal law, the state treats certain parties as the SAME person
@Coolitic They CAN, but do they want the risk and the liability is the question. Most of the legal realm deals with liability.
in civil law this is NOT the case
also
duty to retreat
Is there a question in there, MA?
is the gayest concept on the planet
Duty to retreat is bullshit. Stand your ground should be universal law of the land
how does your coke and pepsi example apply?
"A man's home is his castle." ~ Legal Maxim
Maxim is a men's magazine
not a legal magazine