bruh

they are NOT allowed to testify on behalf of each other in civil law

MA, I'm using corporation in a different sense than you are

they ARE in criminal

they should make citizen's arrests the 11th bill of rights

T-E-S-T-I-F-Y

not represent

"Husband and wife are considered one mind in law." ~ Legal maxim

but that doesn't apply in contract law

they are seprate and distinct

that only applies in criminal law

If Coke buys Pepsi and they have a corporate merger, can Pepsi testify against Coke? That's like testifying against yourself. That is why they can't, cuz you can't force someone to self-incriminate

you aren't hearing me

listen to what i said; your example is inverted. in criminal law, the state treats certain parties as the SAME person

@Coolitic They CAN, but do they want the risk and the liability is the question. Most of the legal realm deals with liability.

in civil law this is NOT the case

also

duty to retreat

Is there a question in there, MA?

is the gayest concept on the planet

Duty to retreat is bullshit. Stand your ground should be universal law of the land

how does your coke and pepsi example apply?

"A man's home is his castle." ~ Legal Maxim

Maxim is a men's magazine

not a legal magazine

😉

```
Stand Your Ground: No duty to retreat from the situation before resorting to deadly force; not limited to your home, place of work, etc.
Castle Doctrine: No duty to retreat before using deadly force if you are in your home or yard (some states include place of work and occupied vehicles).
Duty to Retreat: Duty to retreat from a threatening situation if you can do so with complete safety.
```

yeah, that kinda leaves one open to become an unintended baliee though

if they set up the scene beforehand by throwing something on your property and you have no clue it is theirs.....

It's an analogy, MA. The man is like Coke and the woman is like Pepsi. For legal purposes, you are considered a "person," in this case a "natural person." A person is just a legal construct. To wit: a corporation sole, which the law views as having certain rights. What we commonly call corporations, trusts, companies, etc. are called "artificial persons," "legal persons," or "juristic persons."

When you get married, these two natural persons, these two corporations, merge to become one legal entity. One mind. It's presumed they do so voluntarily and agree on all the consequences and act as one unit. This is why spousal privilege is recognized, cuz again, you can't force someone to testify against themselves (they have to do so voluntarily).

In civil law, there is no incrimination. It's just dealing with torts and contracts, so a spouse is just like any other witness.

I have caught a queen waspp

This is the same reason "corporate personhood" is a thing

again, ANSWER the question i asked

not the question YOU wish

you didn't even address it; just added more details

Maybe I can has a wasp nest as a pet

all of that which you stated i understand and agree with

if corporations are people, they be hella psychopathic people

but in a CRIMINAL case, the husband can testify as the owner of what was stolen even if the wife or business was teh actual owner

>> oh you have cancer and need insurance money? The best we can do is one dollar

this is NOT so under contract l aw