Not thin skin eccles, I personally don't giuve a shit about being insulted. The thing is, someone who insults to win and arguement has a flawed arguement

rofl

That implies the second of my suggetions

of the two of us which one is talking about globalists?

Its not offence, its just making you less belieable

XD

There is a reason its a fallacy you know

Globalist is a label, not an identity

The Benn letter is in play

Attacking character instead of arguement

We are where we are

Joshu, that's what you were doing with the "end is nigh" comments. Move it on now

is invoking the name of jones litterally all you have to say?

and why does this need to be comabt?

"4d chess narrative", then DIg, or would you like an another alternative?

It's not combat, i'm describing your theory

its not even nearly 4d, its plain and flat

I don't think Boris + co intended to have his deal voted down

I mean if its an Alex Jones narrative it'll be proven true in about 5 years time

Lol, that's true

ofcourse not

what made you think some did think that was the intention?

who are you even talking to?

Sure Eccles, but that was attacking your arguements that always seem to be about the doomiest senario. So yeah, it wast ad hominem.

"the deal was just a tool to deactivate the ben act allowing a no-deal exit on the 31st"

yes

However they ammended

To make that tactic moot

correct

how does the deal enable a no-deal exit?

If they didnt ammend Hopix

Johnson and co could have strung out legislation etc

Either way we end up in the same place - EU either offer an extension or they don't

unti;l the 31st

and no deal

oh right yeah

However the amendment headed that off

But then Letwin got around that?

EU offering no extention forces the 5th column to show their hand

no the ben act being out of the way would have made it possible

and where in this is the answer to who thought bojo wanted his deal fucked with