Message from @Joshu
Discord ID: 635419057633624094
and why does this need to be comabt?
"4d chess narrative", then DIg, or would you like an another alternative?
It's not combat, i'm describing your theory
its not even nearly 4d, its plain and flat
I don't think Boris + co intended to have his deal voted down
I mean if its an Alex Jones narrative it'll be proven true in about 5 years time
Lol, that's true
ofcourse not
what made you think some did think that was the intention?
who are you even talking to?
Sure Eccles, but that was attacking your arguements that always seem to be about the doomiest senario. So yeah, it wast ad hominem.
"the deal was just a tool to deactivate the ben act allowing a no-deal exit on the 31st"
yes
However they ammended
To make that tactic moot
correct
how does the deal enable a no-deal exit?
If they didnt ammend Hopix
Johnson and co could have strung out legislation etc
Either way we end up in the same place - EU either offer an extension or they don't
and no deal
oh right yeah
However the amendment headed that off
But then Letwin got around that?
EU offering no extention forces the 5th column to show their hand
no the ben act being out of the way would have made it possible
and where in this is the answer to who thought bojo wanted his deal fucked with
Benn act is irrelevent at this point
is it?
Well no
It is
nope
Since the court challenges next week will be based on it eccles
It's window dressing
It all leads to the same point
With his 3 letter stunt
do you know what the ammendment was on saturday
They're just filler-episodes to take up the time
Also
if the legislation is passed