Not sure where "peace" came into this

Also chill with the personal attacks, it doesn't increase your credibility

Wasn't a personal attack, it was a dig at your approach

Don't know you from Adam

"Stop being a faggot"

Ok bruv

Keep believing that 😉

An extension will not be saught, the deal was just a tool to deactivate the ben act allowing a no-deal exit on the 31st, the gov will attempt to negate saturdays recent ammendment on monday and the real commons clown world will play out over the course of the next two weeks where either the scum seize control of the house and seak an extension themselves or bojo and co duck and dive their way to the 31st with a no deal exit

I'm sorry for flicking your bean, young man, I forgot how thin-skinned some of you all are

Ahh, the "Alex Jones" narrative, Dig

Not thin skin eccles, I personally don't giuve a shit about being insulted. The thing is, someone who insults to win and arguement has a flawed arguement

rofl

That implies the second of my suggetions

of the two of us which one is talking about globalists?

Its not offence, its just making you less belieable

XD

There is a reason its a fallacy you know

Globalist is a label, not an identity

The Benn letter is in play

Attacking character instead of arguement

We are where we are

Joshu, that's what you were doing with the "end is nigh" comments. Move it on now

is invoking the name of jones litterally all you have to say?

and why does this need to be comabt?

"4d chess narrative", then DIg, or would you like an another alternative?

It's not combat, i'm describing your theory

its not even nearly 4d, its plain and flat

I don't think Boris + co intended to have his deal voted down

I mean if its an Alex Jones narrative it'll be proven true in about 5 years time

Lol, that's true

ofcourse not

what made you think some did think that was the intention?

who are you even talking to?

Sure Eccles, but that was attacking your arguements that always seem to be about the doomiest senario. So yeah, it wast ad hominem.

"the deal was just a tool to deactivate the ben act allowing a no-deal exit on the 31st"

yes

However they ammended

To make that tactic moot

correct

how does the deal enable a no-deal exit?

If they didnt ammend Hopix