Lol, that's true

ofcourse not

what made you think some did think that was the intention?

who are you even talking to?

Sure Eccles, but that was attacking your arguements that always seem to be about the doomiest senario. So yeah, it wast ad hominem.

"the deal was just a tool to deactivate the ben act allowing a no-deal exit on the 31st"

yes

However they ammended

To make that tactic moot

correct

how does the deal enable a no-deal exit?

If they didnt ammend Hopix

Johnson and co could have strung out legislation etc

Either way we end up in the same place - EU either offer an extension or they don't

unti;l the 31st

and no deal

oh right yeah

However the amendment headed that off

But then Letwin got around that?

EU offering no extention forces the 5th column to show their hand

no the ben act being out of the way would have made it possible

and where in this is the answer to who thought bojo wanted his deal fucked with

Benn act is irrelevent at this point

is it?

Well no

It is

nope

Since the court challenges next week will be based on it eccles

It's window dressing

It all leads to the same point

With his 3 letter stunt

do you know what the ammendment was on saturday

They're just filler-episodes to take up the time

Also

if the legislation is passed

then it changes somewhat

why is it that bojo is now legally required to seak an extension?

the ben act

and the ammendment

it's the letwin act

they both are