"Even if they were to be classified as factual statements, she had failed to adduce any evidence to that end."!

"Moreover, the applicant had been wrong to assume that improper attacks on religious groups had to be tolerated even if they were based on untrue facts. On the contrary, the Court had held that statements which were based on (manifestly) untrue facts did not enjoy the protection of Article 10."

So essentially, if I said God murdered thousands in in genesis

I could be charged with defamation

Even if I was preaching my relgion

God wasn't a living person

God was emboddied

numerous times in the bible

for the analogy you do have to pick a person who provably existed

"In addition, the impugned statements had not been phrased in a neutral manner aimed at being an objective contribution to a public debate concerning child marriages but rather amounted to a generalisation without factual basis."

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

"Muh freedom of speech!"

"Thus, by considering them as going beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate and classifying them as an abusive attack on the Prophet of Islam, which was capable of stirring up prejudice and putting at risk religious peace, the domestic courts had come to the conclusion that the facts at issue contained elements of incitement to religious intolerance. They had thereby put forward relevant and sufficient reasons and had not overstepped their – wide – margin of appreciation."

Here is a better one

That last one is where I draw the line.

Cain killed Abel

Im a criminal

an abusive attack on the prophet of islam. so, blasphemy then.

In this instance, no @Joshu

How?

"Capable of stirring up prejudice."

The bible isnt evidence

The context

I have defamed cain

moses killed the midianites

You're not holding a seminar, claiming to be an "expert" on the religion, where the wording of the title of said seminar implies fact.

That's the difference

Right so if I held a seminar, as an expert, say a priest.

its not actually illegal to misrepresent history in an essay or lesson

If you lied / defamed someone that would be against the law. Yes.

The seminar is typical religious BS like "God is truth" or something

and then read from the bible

Stating that Cain did in fact kill abel

Lying isn't against the law.

I can now be arrested for preaching the religion

Defamation is.

defamation of a historical religious figure?

Again, read for it yourself

https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22002-12171%22]%7D

but Muhammad is not pressing charge

Should imams be arrested for preaching Muhammed had sex with kids?