Message from @SnowPirate67

Discord ID: 622944032955564042


2019-09-15 23:54:55 UTC  

and we were using the second

2019-09-15 23:55:01 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/613767975614283832/622943482268614697/The-state-of-Texas-is-bigger-than-the-country-of-France-and-Germany.jpg

2019-09-15 23:55:20 UTC  

this man speaks the truth

2019-09-15 23:55:21 UTC  

@Uksio same, but for Virginia.

2019-09-15 23:55:22 UTC  

Again as political argument the State refers to whoever is in charge as a political entity. Doesn’t mean local or otherwise

2019-09-15 23:55:40 UTC  

that is a false equivalence

2019-09-15 23:55:45 UTC  

no it’s not

2019-09-15 23:55:49 UTC  

and it is at the very core of the issue

2019-09-15 23:55:49 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/613767975614283832/622943681032355842/Crosswalk_state_road_paint.png

2019-09-15 23:55:53 UTC  

libertarians will agree with me on this

2019-09-15 23:56:08 UTC  

wtf

2019-09-15 23:56:14 UTC  

However, we’re talking about the specific legal confines of a state itself. From the constitutional sense, it refers to the states; the specific regions of the country with their own political autonomy.

2019-09-15 23:56:19 UTC  

by your argument, a british citizen would conisder the EU and the UK the same

2019-09-15 23:56:32 UTC  

oh hi im british

2019-09-15 23:56:35 UTC  

both fuction as their 'goverment'

2019-09-15 23:56:36 UTC  

Yes they are political entities with the power projection are they not?

2019-09-15 23:56:52 UTC  

well the UK isnt a state

2019-09-15 23:56:55 UTC  

@SnowPirate67 we would just call that a government.

2019-09-15 23:56:58 UTC  

its a collective of states

2019-09-15 23:57:06 UTC  

the State is the government at large

2019-09-15 23:57:11 UTC  

it’s a loose term

2019-09-15 23:57:20 UTC  

each state has its own devolved parliament here

2019-09-15 23:57:22 UTC  

there isn't enough resolution to even hold a conversation if you don't make the distinction to keep them seperate

2019-09-15 23:57:58 UTC  

Unless if made specific, which, within the context of the constitution, refers to the individual regions that became known as “states.”

2019-09-15 23:58:12 UTC  

not in the civil war or seccesion context

2019-09-15 23:58:18 UTC  

the state is primary

2019-09-15 23:58:25 UTC  

the federal gov is secondary

2019-09-15 23:58:59 UTC  

Here you go

2019-09-15 23:59:06 UTC  

therefore saying 'the state has a monopoly on force' confuses the issue

2019-09-15 23:59:09 UTC  

Or, for those who aren’t American, the individual principality/region had primacy over the main governing body.

2019-09-15 23:59:18 UTC  

^^

2019-09-15 23:59:49 UTC  

however, for the europeans they don't make that distinction; it's all centralized or nothing

2019-09-16 00:00:01 UTC  

wait snowpirate, if you wouldnt refer to the american states as states what term would you use then?

2019-09-16 00:00:07 UTC  

for them, the authority on the local level comes from the top

2019-09-16 00:00:13 UTC  

for us, it comes form the bottom

2019-09-16 00:00:17 UTC  

Think about it like the Swiss government. You have the main Swiss government and then all of the principalities that make up Switzerland.

2019-09-16 00:00:54 UTC  

It’s the State as a whole. The “State” is the entire Govt from local to the federal. It’s all one and the same political entity as the US govt

2019-09-16 00:01:07 UTC  

i’ll link this again for you to read

2019-09-16 00:01:14 UTC  

Each one of them, if we assume a pre-Civil war US mindset, had more political say within their boundaries than the federal government.