They would have to prove its false or meets the fair use requirements- youtube literally doesn't care about innocent till proven, its the other way- guilty to proven innocent

Like I said, he’s a bell end

His science stuff is usually good though.

And he’s done a couple of walkthroughs of reactors, which was interesting.

And TBH if you look at the DMCA laws even fair use isn't protected anymore at least within the EU (Art 11 and 13), <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

That got passed and is supposed to be rolled out within the next 12-20 months

Its legal mandate so every EU country has to abide by it

whats it gonna be for anti brexit youtubers
>get fucked over by EU laws
or just accept brexit and have regular laws

Well that's because DMCA doesn't apply outside of the US.

I dunno dude, most of us dont care anymore tbh

BRexit aint happening

>

yep it is

The powers that be have said so and that is that, the supreme court of the UK literally voted against parliament yesterday

Currently set for Halloween this year, even if there's no agreement.

Which theoretically means parliament need to be recalled

You have missed half of the debate then calbeck

The Supreme Court actually noted the Halloween deadline.

I read the decision this morning.

Since when the fuck could the Supreme Court of the UK declare anything against a democratic referendum

They didn't.

By oct 31 the PM MUST go to Brussel and ask the EU for an extension or accept whatever deal they offer- this was passed in the house of commons, if he refuses then there is a democratic crisis, the elected leader is "refusing to carry out the will of parliament"

It has passed the lords as well

They declared that the PM can't advise the Queen to prorogue Parliament, as that's the Privy Council's job... and, incidentally, they also said the Privy Council had so advised the Queen.

I personally hope he doesn't, a constitutional crisis would be funny

The UK parliament is going to run itself into the ground over this shit

Quite the opposite, according to the ruling.

https://metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/mace-theft-f9bf.gif
cant someone just grab the mace and declare trial by combat

It states that an extension must be requested... and that's it, because Parliament ordered the extension request. But the deal itself is outside of UK authority entirely.

This is why we need AR-15s tbh

If the EU says "we will charge you 1 billion a months" as they are with this temp extension then BoJo must accept it or stand a vote of no confidence, I hope he does the no confidence, because tory will win <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

The extension, in fact, is ONLY required if there is NO deal.

And everyone knows it

Yep.

I strongly suggest you go and rewatch the vote

Its already been had, parliament have given him his orders, if he deosn't comply shenanigans begins

I'm hoping Parliament ganks themselves. Too bad the Queen's ability to dissolve Parliament got sniped in 2011.

They'll argue not having a deal = no deal

I'm talking about the Supreme Court's ruling, not the vote.

I don't care about the supreme court, the point being made is that the institutions of the land have determined BRexit shouldn't happen regardless of what the people voted- democracy is irrelevant

Unfortunately BRexit was required to pull back that veil