Message from @Calbeck
Discord ID: 626295970690498583
I don't care for thunder foots politics
Science youtuber tries to talk politics: thunderfoot
Politics youtuber tries to talk science: kraut n tea
tldr is he made a video about a kickstarter scam, part of that is him making fun of another youtuber who reviewed the product positively. said youtuber filed a false copyright claim. thunderfoot was in the right and threatened legal action to the guy to take down the claim and apologize. guy later takes down the claim and thunderfoot gloats about it but now he insists that the guy do an apology video about it instead of what every other youtuber wouldve done which is to just walk away and forget about the drama
I wouldn't of taken down the claim <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
I would of said bring it on pussy
If your at the bottom of the pile the only way is up
Filing false claims can get your channel demonetized or banned
guy wouldve lost since thunderfoots original video is perfeclty along fair use
hes just being a dick about it
They would have to prove its false or meets the fair use requirements- youtube literally doesn't care about innocent till proven, its the other way- guilty to proven innocent
Like I said, he’s a bell end
His science stuff is usually good though.
And he’s done a couple of walkthroughs of reactors, which was interesting.
And TBH if you look at the DMCA laws even fair use isn't protected anymore at least within the EU (Art 11 and 13), <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
That got passed and is supposed to be rolled out within the next 12-20 months
Its legal mandate so every EU country has to abide by it
whats it gonna be for anti brexit youtubers
>get fucked over by EU laws
or just accept brexit and have regular laws
I dunno dude, most of us dont care anymore tbh
BRexit aint happening
>
yep it is
The powers that be have said so and that is that, the supreme court of the UK literally voted against parliament yesterday
Currently set for Halloween this year, even if there's no agreement.
Which theoretically means parliament need to be recalled
You have missed half of the debate then calbeck
The Supreme Court actually noted the Halloween deadline.
I read the decision this morning.
Since when the fuck could the Supreme Court of the UK declare anything against a democratic referendum
They didn't.
By oct 31 the PM MUST go to Brussel and ask the EU for an extension or accept whatever deal they offer- this was passed in the house of commons, if he refuses then there is a democratic crisis, the elected leader is "refusing to carry out the will of parliament"
It has passed the lords as well
They declared that the PM can't advise the Queen to prorogue Parliament, as that's the Privy Council's job... and, incidentally, they also said the Privy Council had so advised the Queen.
I personally hope he doesn't, a constitutional crisis would be funny
The UK parliament is going to run itself into the ground over this shit
Quite the opposite, according to the ruling.
https://metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/mace-theft-f9bf.gif
cant someone just grab the mace and declare trial by combat
It states that an extension must be requested... and that's it, because Parliament ordered the extension request. But the deal itself is outside of UK authority entirely.

