Which theoretically means parliament need to be recalled

You have missed half of the debate then calbeck

The Supreme Court actually noted the Halloween deadline.

I read the decision this morning.

Since when the fuck could the Supreme Court of the UK declare anything against a democratic referendum

They didn't.

By oct 31 the PM MUST go to Brussel and ask the EU for an extension or accept whatever deal they offer- this was passed in the house of commons, if he refuses then there is a democratic crisis, the elected leader is "refusing to carry out the will of parliament"

It has passed the lords as well

They declared that the PM can't advise the Queen to prorogue Parliament, as that's the Privy Council's job... and, incidentally, they also said the Privy Council had so advised the Queen.

I personally hope he doesn't, a constitutional crisis would be funny

The UK parliament is going to run itself into the ground over this shit

Quite the opposite, according to the ruling.

https://metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/mace-theft-f9bf.gif
cant someone just grab the mace and declare trial by combat

It states that an extension must be requested... and that's it, because Parliament ordered the extension request. But the deal itself is outside of UK authority entirely.

This is why we need AR-15s tbh

If the EU says "we will charge you 1 billion a months" as they are with this temp extension then BoJo must accept it or stand a vote of no confidence, I hope he does the no confidence, because tory will win <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

The extension, in fact, is ONLY required if there is NO deal.

And everyone knows it

Yep.

I strongly suggest you go and rewatch the vote

Its already been had, parliament have given him his orders, if he deosn't comply shenanigans begins

I'm hoping Parliament ganks themselves. Too bad the Queen's ability to dissolve Parliament got sniped in 2011.

They'll argue not having a deal = no deal

I'm talking about the Supreme Court's ruling, not the vote.

I don't care about the supreme court, the point being made is that the institutions of the land have determined BRexit shouldn't happen regardless of what the people voted- democracy is irrelevant

Unfortunately BRexit was required to pull back that veil

We now know that our voting is pointless <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

Well then, execute Order 1776 -:)

The only thing that will correct that is if BoJo goes full tilt balls to wall and says "fuck you all were out 31/10"

Its not surprising democracy is irrelevant when not only do they have no sense of British values but are in fact anti British

Real shocker

Dank is great

And like I said if he does that immediately a legal case will go against him for not complying with "the law" and secondly a vote of no confidence to force a GE

You could almost say he's.... Dank

If he is there for a GE tory's win, if he isn't (hence the court case) they will be on the edge

Incidentally, the Supreme Court also noted that the referendum is legally binding despite "technically" not being.

The courts will take forever to get anything done anyway

Doubt they'd reverse it though they'd want to

So yes, it's a solid that Parliament is disobeying the law in the form of the referendum.

Outside of BoJO and maybe Dominic Raab tories don't have any strong candidates, though the brown dude and lady whose names I have forgotten seem to be very pro BRexit as well 🤷