Sueprheroes
without a differentiating characteristic, the only way to know is to track the transition
How would you even differentiate an identity of an electron in the first place?
I just wanted to meme
The electron has a flavour
Ask it if it identifies as an electron, don't assume it does <:Kappa:386676594120589312>
Just taste it and find out
Well, you specified disappear and reappear - thus the distinction is made by the observer that is must be the same.
Fun fact: heat is just a reverberating vibration on a small small scale
that's my point; the identity is intrinsic; the definiton is external
Cold comes from the cold gods
one is a ref
the other is the thing being referenced
Cold does not exist
Only heat does
heat does not exist
Cold is absence of heat (molecular motion).
only motion does
You can't have a quantifiable "unvibrations" of the molecules
Nothing exists <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
Well, heat is energy transfer of that motion.
Only Mikey exists, you all are a figment of my imagination.
yup
heat = motion on a small scale (molecular grid)
Nigger
Listen to these gay cunts talking about science and shit instead of rabble rousing for the next clan meeting <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Also, one would argue that motion is also fallacious- it is just energy that *is*.
@JackH670
hard R ooooo <:monkaS:458231808694157314>
that is also the main point; if you refuse to change 'scope/scale' you can say, 'heat dne' within this particular scope
each 'scope' is an infinity
and infinities can nest
As you said, Reference Frames.
Nothing is static. You can only ever assume a reference frame.
