Message from @Muten

Discord ID: 599191438663876608


2019-07-12 10:49:46 UTC  

yeah but their economy is going to crash hard

2019-07-12 10:49:51 UTC  

China's per capita carbon emissions are actually worse than Europe at this point. Their total emissions beat Europe and the USA combined.

2019-07-12 10:50:01 UTC  

And because they grew their population to gargantuan numbers under communism on purpose

2019-07-12 10:50:38 UTC  

@Muten - That's why wealthy Chinese people are bailing at floodwater levels. People who are in the know are trying to GTFO while they still can.

2019-07-12 10:50:39 UTC  

just send them all back to africa

2019-07-12 10:50:44 UTC  

On the map the US is green while Europe is yellow which is really only because of population density and China and India are dark ass red

2019-07-12 10:50:53 UTC  

The Chinese are starting to build renewables

2019-07-12 10:51:05 UTC  

They're building coal faster.

2019-07-12 10:51:13 UTC  

stop their welfare, give them a lump sum, buy them a 1 way ticket and escort them away

2019-07-12 10:51:28 UTC  

The Chinese will survive by killing millions to make it happen because communism

2019-07-12 10:51:29 UTC  

Why is declining birth rates even a bad thing? I mean I get the neolib argument but I'm not a neolib

2019-07-12 10:51:30 UTC  

China's only building renewables to boost their international reputation. They built a giant wind farm that isn't even hooked up to the grid.

2019-07-12 10:51:33 UTC  

they're using hypersupermegacritical coal power plants tho

2019-07-12 10:51:44 UTC  

@Muten its not a bad thing

2019-07-12 10:52:04 UTC  

@Muten because we all get replaced with niggers

2019-07-12 10:52:06 UTC  

Perpetual growth with finite resources isnt possible

2019-07-12 10:52:20 UTC  

and also rat utopia

2019-07-12 10:52:24 UTC  

@ebinmemes22 don't import niggers

2019-07-12 10:52:32 UTC  

Its a bad thing because the aging population where 30% of the population will be paying for 70% of retired people

2019-07-12 10:52:47 UTC  

Its unstainable and they'd all just end up with no welfare and die lol

2019-07-12 10:52:51 UTC  

their numbers are great but they are nothing on a global scale

2019-07-12 10:52:53 UTC  

@ebinmemes22 rat DISTOPIA becouse they were lackin very important ressources

2019-07-12 10:52:55 UTC  

Which will hurt short term

2019-07-12 10:52:57 UTC  

@JackH670 - China's "green energy" push is all show. Their wind farms aren't even connected or being used.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/05/23/how-china-is-blowing-its-chance-to-lead-the-world-in-wind-energy/

2019-07-12 10:53:13 UTC  

But having more kids to keep up with the boomers will hurt longer term

2019-07-12 10:53:32 UTC  

Decrease in population would rape the economy but we'd bounce back eventually

2019-07-12 10:53:33 UTC  

@Samaritan well only the people who rely on welfare will die

2019-07-12 10:54:08 UTC  

the economy is fucked

2019-07-12 10:54:13 UTC  

Problem is China will become the world Hegemone in that time spam

2019-07-12 10:54:14 UTC  

we need long term solutions

2019-07-12 10:54:15 UTC  

A decreasing population only makes sense if you're willing to hang old people out to dry, and I'm not sure we're ready to do that.

2019-07-12 10:54:16 UTC  

Why wouldn't it

2019-07-12 10:54:16 UTC  

to fix it

2019-07-12 10:54:17 UTC  

It was inevitable we'd have lower birthrates compared to the generation that have 8-9 siblings

2019-07-12 10:54:32 UTC  

yeee belle is fucked

2019-07-12 10:54:32 UTC  

yeah

2019-07-12 10:54:42 UTC  

Yeah, but "lower birth rates" was supposed to mean 2.1 kids. Replacement rate. Steady population.

2019-07-12 10:54:48 UTC  

everything relies on china dying before they can get world hegemone

2019-07-12 10:54:55 UTC  

The next generation would be exponentially poorer

2019-07-12 10:55:08 UTC  

there is no reason why we should have more than 0.25 children per woman