Message from @ebinmemes22
Discord ID: 599191113667969034
Instead of trying to import people to solve the declining birth rate we should actually just massively encourage bitrates
or just let them decline
Nah it'll be India and China
On a purely objective standpoint, stupid people and religious fundamentalists are winning the future. It's going to be Africans vs Fundamentalist Christians vs Asians vs Muslims, with a minority of SJWs running around like a chicken with its head cut off.
Muten is autistic that's why he appears to be
SJWs are a fad
Normally you'd expect Asians to win, but their baby bust is going to fuck them over HARD.
China is only a world player because they basically don't give a fuck have no regulations will use slave labour and pollute the environment ext
yeah but their economy is going to crash hard
China's per capita carbon emissions are actually worse than Europe at this point. Their total emissions beat Europe and the USA combined.
And because they grew their population to gargantuan numbers under communism on purpose
@Muten - That's why wealthy Chinese people are bailing at floodwater levels. People who are in the know are trying to GTFO while they still can.
just send them all back to africa
On the map the US is green while Europe is yellow which is really only because of population density and China and India are dark ass red
The Chinese are starting to build renewables
They're building coal faster.
stop their welfare, give them a lump sum, buy them a 1 way ticket and escort them away
The Chinese will survive by killing millions to make it happen because communism
Why is declining birth rates even a bad thing? I mean I get the neolib argument but I'm not a neolib
China's only building renewables to boost their international reputation. They built a giant wind farm that isn't even hooked up to the grid.
@Muten because we all get replaced with niggers
Perpetual growth with finite resources isnt possible
and also rat utopia
@ebinmemes22 don't import niggers
Its a bad thing because the aging population where 30% of the population will be paying for 70% of retired people
Its unstainable and they'd all just end up with no welfare and die lol
their numbers are great but they are nothing on a global scale
@ebinmemes22 rat DISTOPIA becouse they were lackin very important ressources
Which will hurt short term
@JackH670 - China's "green energy" push is all show. Their wind farms aren't even connected or being used.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/05/23/how-china-is-blowing-its-chance-to-lead-the-world-in-wind-energy/
But having more kids to keep up with the boomers will hurt longer term
Decrease in population would rape the economy but we'd bounce back eventually
@Samaritan well only the people who rely on welfare will die
the economy is fucked
Problem is China will become the world Hegemone in that time spam
we need long term solutions
A decreasing population only makes sense if you're willing to hang old people out to dry, and I'm not sure we're ready to do that.
Why wouldn't it