Message from @livid_scrooge
Discord ID: 607398890093805581
yes, i know. but i do not know why you are placing the yield of a weapon over the combined radioactive effect
I'm talking about the Nukes being capable of yeeting a body of land from existence
not the after-effects of the nuke
it would take ALOT more nukes than 20k to destroy evern spot on the planet via detonations
AH
now i get the disconnect
that's some sci-fi nonsense
>not really
why would you even consider that a valid question?
yes really. nothing we have can destroy a physcial land mass directl y
best we could do is trigger a volcano or something seismic
not even
?
our best bet is to use a FUCK TON of asteroids
Volcanic explosions aren't all that powerful compared to our combined nukes
welll, anything ballistic would have that effect
it's the idea that a startship doesn't need weapons
it IS a weapon just because it can nose dive into the planet with the kinetic energy that killed the dinosaurs
are you trying to trrigger people?
dragging an object around the solar system big enough to do more damage than a nuke would be a long process
the strongest Earthquake possible with our current Magnitude scale is BARELY above the power of the combined nuclear arsenal (in terms of the after-shocks themselves; the total joules released are still real fucking powerful)
Demographics are demographics
the only ones that matter are politcial ones
Sorry
Pressed paste again
My mistake
incorrect trotsky
The strongest earthquake 'ever measured'
was a 10.5?
geologically before man we have had MUCH MUCH worse on earth
yes
@Muten You do realize that all those other ethnicities tend to vote overwhelmingly democrat, right?
Needs an overlay with total population numbers across race and the cause for change in demographics also
10.5 was worst every measured which is why it isn't 1-10 anymore
so? they are niggers using nigger logic
cause one was 'off the chart'
@Weez That inphographic makes me happy
we shouldn't use nigger logic because that's how we become niggers
