He put this out 10 months ago. I thought now wouldn't be a bad time for a closer look in to who they are.

I always thought his chalkboard talks were top notch, especially ones connecting historical events to current events.

He usually screws up trying to predict stuff or fill time, though.

Cheeto-dust Glenn is pretty desperate when it comes to grasping at comedy.

I dismiss Styx's comments on Glenn because Styx just has a stick up his ass about Glenn being a theist.

Ever since Glenn Beck went fucking psycho on cable tv he's been radioactive af

@TanukiCutie<3 Glenn Beck is legitimately gay holy fuck

I've never seen a Right-Wing figure who's more gay (other than Milo Yiannopolous)

Gotta love the no-content hit mobs.

'fucking psycho on cable tv' hm... If I remember correctly he went 'psycho' by doing what.... Oh right... Calling out that willing Nazi collaborator George Soros.

And he was right about Soros.

Huh. How about that.

Now his Blaze Network is big enough to absorb Mark Levin into his organization. Seems kinda the opposite of radioactive to me.

You believe what you want, though.

ICE attacker manifesto https://mediaweb.kirotv.com/document_dev/2019/07/15/Manifesto_15897725_ver1.0.pdf

The fact that Beck is willing to work with Levin is a pretty good sign he's a controlled opposition.

Pls gib pussy

Yeah, not following that line of no-content accusation, Mini-Me.

Being critical of Trump is what anyone is supposed to do, not just 'controlled opposition' and the far left.

But what do I know, i'm just a Libertarian that doesn't care for people being crony corporatists.

That's just about the only complaint I can offer personally against Trump. He's willing to use government as a tool to benefit businesses directly, because he's benefited himself that way. For him to go against that would be him being a hypocrite.

Trump isn't doing a bad job at all as president, but we are still a far far ways away from where we should be constitutionally.

It’s been that way even before FDR

I just want a legal system that's simple enough that you don't commit 5 crimes before lunch every day.

"no-content accusation"
I never said he was controlled opposition because he was critical of Trump

You never said why he was controlled opposition period.

Levin

that's why it's no content.

Levin is a person, not a reason.

Levin is controlled opposition. Or perhaps simply an opportunist. Can't stand to affiliate with anyone who is actually more right wing than the acceptable 3 by 5 establishment for the most part.

Has a network "Rebel Media" but then allows the left to define their moral imperatives.

Occam's razor, Mini-Me.

Every person and group should be allowed to define their moral imperatives, I don't see what's wrong with that.

Problems come when they either don't live up to their own rules, or try to force their rules on to others.

Antifa defines their moral imperatives. Doesn't mean I have to respect them for it.

If someone's consistently a cuck, they're still a cuck.

Antifa pretends to have moral imperatives. Everything they are against being done, they do.

That's because those aren't their actual moral imperatives.

Nor is Levin's stated moral imperatives likely his actual ones.

Very few people will actually explain, transparently, what imperatives they truly operate on.

For most people, it's a kind of graft. They pretend to hold imperatives they think *others* will admire/respect them for holding.