Message from @☩ ✠ Valka ✠ ☩
Discord ID: 601790901894774784
🤔
They used to be very high up in people's minds
And afaik people still think Greenpeace is doing mostly good things
If Greenpeace is mostly not doing good things, what are they doing? Out of curiosity. Don't really know that much about them other than they do environmental protests.
Yall talking shit about obama watch out theres a plane bout to blow up in congress and the squad is gonna jump out of it
Aloha snackbar
@TheCinemaShow They're still doing environmental activism, but their internal structure is so authoritarian and thus becomes dogmatic that they often go against real science. Their activism causes more harm than good.
They're exactly like SJW's. Dissenting voices can't get a word in, so they turn into an authoritarian echo chamber.
There's also the extended damage they're causing. Because of their dogmatism, they brainwash other citizens who then act the same way. For example my grandfather successfully protested the Zwentendorf AKW (a planned nuclear power plant in Austria) living on nothing but donations. That plant could've helped the country tremendously, thanks to him it just turned into a money sink before it was stopped. It also made him an insufferable father, he had eight children who all had to endure his immense ego and lack of care.
I have nothing against people who are pro-environment, in fact I always support the preservation of natural land if it makes any sense. But some people push this idea to the extreme to the detriment of the society.
Or just take Germany. These stupid NPCs are in the process of stopping all of their nuclear power plants.
This is thanks to groups like Greenpeace pushing out alarmist propaganda.
No one can explain why they're against this source of power after they see the statistics on energy safety.
So what this means is that the citizens are effectively donating to groups that then brainwash the citizens to go against science.
Interesting. Good to know, thanks @ETBrooD . I do tend to view environmentalism as a truly non-partisan issue that we should all support, but unfortunately the simple concept of "Hey, let's not fuck up our planet" get co-opted by leftists to push their alarmist propaganda. Seems Greenpeace is yet another group doing that.
Indeed
If you think about it, your grandparent damaged the environment more by blocking the nuclear plant.
Yeah, and it's not that I don't understand him, I probably would've supported him back then. It's a propaganda machine that causes this.
This is why I find it so laughable when people say journalism used to be objective. No it never was objective.
Journalists can only be objective if they abide by the scientific method, which they don't.
They helped NSDAP to get in power.
Not the achievement they were hoping for, but it's something.
>
WTF are you talking about @leavethisbotnet
The german communist movement.
I thought they called themselves that.
"we'll protect you against communism" was NSDAP's big thing
Sure; communists
Not Antifa though
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifaschistische_Aktion>
`The first German movement to call itself Antifaschistische Aktion was proclaimed by the German Communist Party (KPD) in their newspaper Rote Fahne in 1932 and held its first rally in Berlin on 10 July 1932, then capital of the Weimar Republic.`
They are the same fucking thing.
Disparate to modern incarnations
9 years prior
`The first local branches of the RFB were established in July 1924.[2][3][4] The group's inaugural nationwide meeting was held in February 1925`
Street battles between extremist factions made the German public lose all confidence in the Weimar government, which could not maintain order.
`The KPD depended on the Proletarian Hundreds (German: Proletarische Hundertschaften) to protect their meetings and demonstrations, but this organization was banned in 1923.`
Neither the NSDAP nor Antifa were the first of these extremist factions.