This is thanks to groups like Greenpeace pushing out alarmist propaganda.

No one can explain why they're against this source of power after they see the statistics on energy safety.
So what this means is that the citizens are effectively donating to groups that then brainwash the citizens to go against science.

Interesting. Good to know, thanks @ETBrooD . I do tend to view environmentalism as a truly non-partisan issue that we should all support, but unfortunately the simple concept of "Hey, let's not fuck up our planet" get co-opted by leftists to push their alarmist propaganda. Seems Greenpeace is yet another group doing that.

Indeed

If you think about it, your grandparent damaged the environment more by blocking the nuclear plant.

Yeah, and it's not that I don't understand him, I probably would've supported him back then. It's a propaganda machine that causes this.

This is why I find it so laughable when people say journalism used to be objective. No it never was objective.

Journalists can only be objective if they abide by the scientific method, which they don't.

@Muten

Has ANTIFA ever achieved anything?

They helped NSDAP to get in power.

Not the achievement they were hoping for, but it's something.

>

WTF are you talking about @leavethisbotnet

The german communist movement.

I thought they called themselves that.

"we'll protect you against communism" was NSDAP's big thing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roter_Frontk%C3%A4mpferbund

Sure; communists

Not Antifa though

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifaschistische_Aktion>
`The first German movement to call itself Antifaschistische Aktion was proclaimed by the German Communist Party (KPD) in their newspaper Rote Fahne in 1932 and held its first rally in Berlin on 10 July 1932, then capital of the Weimar Republic.`

They are the same fucking thing.

Disparate to modern incarnations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Hall_Putsch

9 years prior

`The first local branches of the RFB were established in July 1924.[2][3][4] The group's inaugural nationwide meeting was held in February 1925`

Street battles between extremist factions made the German public lose all confidence in the Weimar government, which could not maintain order.

`The KPD depended on the Proletarian Hundreds (German: Proletarische Hundertschaften) to protect their meetings and demonstrations, but this organization was banned in 1923.`

Neither the NSDAP nor Antifa were the first of these extremist factions.

This was a phenomenon that had been building since the end of WW1.

Agreed

The back and forth between both of the extreme ideologies was the problem, not one ideology by itself.

NSDAP wasnt extreme

merely an antidote to bolshevism

Saying "violent commies good, violent fascists bad" is just as retarded as "violent fascists good, violent commies bad".

The problem we have today is that the mainstream media and the establishment political left are saying "violent commies good".

This is going to inevitably lead to some folk on the right saying "violent fascists good".

Fascism isnt rightwing

This cycle of retardation will continue to escalate.

Enlightened fart huffing centrists will achieve nothing as usual