which incidentally means that the far left is correct

them or the actual, unironic Evolafags

not sure which

but one of the 2

if morality is subjective

Perhaps it just means that morals within a society are a social construct based on a majority feeling within that society

it is either so depending on nature or nurture

if that is true, system, then the SJWs are 100% correct

and there is no reality

at least in any meaningful sense

Most people agree that beating dogs with sticks is wrong, there's one moral and thus law by extrapolation of how unacceptable it is to break the moral

none of this means that there isn't objectively moral standards, just that people have a hard time not falling in line

you're basically conflating what is socially acceptable with what should be

which is different concepts

It depends on the intent of the beating.

I just don't see how morals can come to exist without a function being group acceptance or consensus on what is right or wrong. In fact we know this to be true based on looking at how different moral codes exist in different countries

raed more books

Don't you dare say the bible

unironically this is my answer

You shouldn't start with the Bible tbh

very hard read

confusing

and clearly more about lateral thinking then about rational

Law does impart moral behavior because our system of law was affected by canon law of the Catholic church.

plus the Bible is actually kinda pointless if you dont do reading around it

unless ur some sort of genius

Protestants are dumb basically

That book is much better served with help from smart ppl suggesting interpretations

then on ur own, as a simple read

but don;t start with that shit anyway

I was joking, someone the other night was making the case for morals being divine

It's kinda hard to argue they are not if you want to argue for universal morality tbh. At least in some sense.

Yay, the gang violence phenomenon already happening in Sweden and Denmark is now landing to Finland too

I'm so thrilled

I have to go for a while, here's some food for discussion. Does "moral" behaviour increase according the the level of empathy an individual is capable of?

Doubtful. Even if we remain in the scope of Western, decidedly Christian moral codes wherein empathy is literally the highest virtue, empathy unrestrained by reason (to some degree at least) just doesn't lead to competence. So you can feel really compassionate for the other, but won't know how to help him...

In Catholicism for instance Caritas is the highest virtue, but it's not the only one.

Lmao, Schiff yammering on about "Muh American Dream" is comical

So... Citizens of the country which the sun is yet to set on, how do you feel about your new PM.

@Dostayer It is a start, although I will do not think he is a true Conservative as he is a social Liberal. However, he is politically incorrect in a Broadchurch party of other politically correct people. I don't usually watch the Hustings debates. I stuck the last one on and low and behold, the first question I heard was "how will you deal with islamophobia and injustices". That is a "low tory" if I ever heard one. I just hope the cabinet is based. Farage wouldn't have to stand against Boris if that is the case.

He is a huge improvement over May