Message from @SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck

Discord ID: 609161424568188930


2019-08-08 22:58:35 UTC  

@whiic do you consider a "cyber-war" to be an actual war?

2019-08-08 22:58:37 UTC  

Resistance can also be below the physical level of violence. This is via non-violent means, such as Gandhi's opposition to the British Empire or Martin Luther King's marches. Both desired their factions to deescalate the conflict while the state escalates against them, the objective being to target the opponent on the moral and mental levels rather than the physical level. The state is then seen as a bully and loses support.

2019-08-08 22:59:31 UTC  

@SnowPirate67 But was Gandhi's passive resistance a "war"? Was Gandhi thus by definition a warmonger, warhawk, warlord?

2019-08-08 23:00:23 UTC  

in some aspects yes it was a form of 4GW. They were initially denied participation and demanded redress and by their means got the goals they desired

2019-08-08 23:02:03 UTC  

So far nothing but strawmen, red herrings, and constantly begging the question

2019-08-08 23:02:11 UTC  

whole lot of logical fallacies

2019-08-08 23:02:22 UTC  

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Well, if drone strikes are not war, then how could cyber attacks (even if done by a state, against another state) be war?

2019-08-08 23:04:11 UTC  

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/war
@whiic
War can also mean "a state of hostility, conflict, or antagonism" or even "a struggle or competition between opposing forces or for a particular end" (Class War for example)

2019-08-08 23:04:35 UTC  

Well, I don't believe in class war.

2019-08-08 23:04:41 UTC  

That's a lot of crap.

2019-08-08 23:05:10 UTC  

@whiic I'd consider drone-strikes to be on the level of border-skirmishes, not an all-out war, but that's just my opinion 🤷🏻

2019-08-08 23:06:20 UTC  

And I consider "cyber war" as it exists between many countries to be even less than border-skirmishes. It's more like espionage, breach of airspace without shooting.

2019-08-08 23:06:59 UTC  

When digital espionage crosses to what I would consider "cyber war" is when nuclear plants melt down and there's actual casualties.

2019-08-08 23:07:20 UTC  

Stealing corporate secrets of a rivaling country is not literal warfare.

2019-08-08 23:08:13 UTC  

@whiic so would you consider the "Pig War" to be an actual war or not?

2019-08-08 23:09:24 UTC  

Don't know. Too specific and too historic to care.

2019-08-08 23:09:35 UTC  

<:thunk:462282216467333140>

2019-08-08 23:09:47 UTC  

It'd help to look at the wikipedia article

2019-08-08 23:10:01 UTC  

God, I can't believe I have to do this....

2019-08-08 23:10:16 UTC  

TL;DR: The USA and UK got into a war against eachother over pigs

2019-08-08 23:10:34 UTC  

There was a single casualty....

2019-08-08 23:10:37 UTC  

a single pig.

2019-08-08 23:10:42 UTC  

Did Congress declare war?

2019-08-08 23:11:00 UTC  

Or did the UK declare a war instead?

2019-08-08 23:12:06 UTC  

I don't even find the words like starting with "decl" (declared, declaration, etc.)

2019-08-08 23:12:19 UTC  

So no war was declared. Not an official state of war.

2019-08-08 23:12:32 UTC  

And no shots were fired, so not un-official skirmish either.

2019-08-08 23:12:47 UTC  

By any standard, it has nothing to do with war.

2019-08-08 23:13:09 UTC  

apparently there hasn't been a war declared by Congress since 1941

2019-08-08 23:13:13 UTC  

I know.

2019-08-08 23:13:24 UTC  

does that mean that the Korean War wasn't a war, if Congress didn't declare it to be as such?

2019-08-08 23:13:36 UTC  

what about Vietnam?

2019-08-08 23:13:45 UTC  

USA just does "world policing". Either with drones or with boots on the ground. They just "fuck the Constitution, LOL".

2019-08-08 23:14:39 UTC  

Well Korean War has shots fired at humans, and causualties, mass casualties, and was obviously a de-facto state of war (even for USA).

2019-08-08 23:15:21 UTC  

How is that comparable to "Pig War" which even according to article linked by you, did not result in declaration of war and also **zero fucking casualties on any side**.

2019-08-08 23:15:50 UTC  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-War
Is a conflict to be considered a war if it's not declared but there are casualties (or if there are no casualties but it's declared)? Or do both conditions (Congress has to declare a formal war, and there has to be casualties) have to be met for it to be considered a war? In other words, does the conflict have to be a de facto war, or can it also be a de jure war?

2019-08-08 23:15:56 UTC  

The level of mental gymnastics is insane

2019-08-08 23:19:10 UTC  

I could consider Antifa vs. govt to be an undeclared civil war if and only if police started shooting Antifa members. So far Antifa has conducted a one-sided war against the govt, which is ironic because usually govt does one-sided war against others (via drones).